Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5 f65c814eff fix: put the popup close button in the dock, and clear the printer location
Three things, none of them redesigns.

The close affordance for a secondary Chrome window was a separate
layer-shell surface anchored to that window's corner, repositioned by a
five-per-second poll. Any position change tore the surface down and
built another, so on real hardware it chased the window and flickered.
Removed entirely: the GTK button process, the geometry maths that placed
it, the --close-button mode that spawned it, and the poll loop that
drove it. The window helper no longer imports GTK at all.

The behaviour underneath it was right and is kept. The first Chrome
top-level is the classroom browser, tiled and borderless; later ones
float centred at about three quarters of the output. Creation order is
the only thing that can tell them apart — confirmed on a real session,
where every Chrome top-level shares app_id, shell, PID and a null
transient_for, and sway exposes no window properties for Wayland
toplevels at all. Titles are still not used. It now follows sway's own
window events instead of polling, so dragging a popup costs nothing.

Close moved into the dock, which was already on screen and does not
move, so it cannot chase anything. It appears only while a secondary
window is focused and runs kill on that one container. The helper
publishes which window that is; the dock watches the file rather than
polling. A stock sway title bar has no close button, so restoring the
border would not have solved this either.

Two bugs found by looking rather than by testing state. Chrome
renegotiates the size of a popup opened with explicit dimensions after
the resize returns, which left windows centred for a width they no
longer had; placement now settles and repeats once, at creation only, so
dragging is still free. And the dock's Close button came up empty
because show_all does not recurse into a no-show-all widget.

The printer's Location is now blank. CUPS prints it under the queue name
in every dialog, so "Ekklesia Classroom" was a second line the teacher
had to read past; the identity is one word. The already-configured check
includes Location, so a machine set up before this is corrected rather
than left as close enough.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
2026-09-06 20:24:51 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5 a1a218b29f fix: draw classroom icons at the display's real pixel density
Icons went soft under UI_SCALE while the clock text beside them stayed
sharp, which is visible on a 24" monitor even if it hides on a TV.

new_from_file_at_scale rasterises an SVG at its *logical* size. The
artwork is vector, but by the time sway scaled the session it was
already a fixed raster, and the compositor enlarged that. Text never had
the problem because GTK draws it at the real density.

GTK 3 has no fractional scaling, so sway advertises the ceiling integer
scale and scales the finished buffer down. Measured under sway: scale
factor 1 at output scale 1.0, and 2 at 1.25, 1.5 and 2.0. So each icon
is now rasterised at size x scale_factor physical pixels and handed to
GTK as a cairo surface carrying that device scale. The icon lands at the
real density; its logical size, and the whole dock layout, is unchanged.

Icons redraw on notify::scale-factor as well as at realize, since the
scale factor is not known until a widget is on a display and changes if
UI_SCALE is changed under a running session.

Browser, DVD, LIVE and all six DVD control icons go through it, in a
shared module so the dock and the DVD session cannot diverge. The
throbber is drawn rather than loaded and had the same flaw, so it draws
on a device-scaled surface too rather than being the one soft thing left
in a sharp dock.

The artwork is untouched. Verified by rendering the dock under sway at
1.0, 1.25, 1.5 and 2.0 against the previous build: apparent icon size is
identical at every scale (28, 35, 42, 56 px), 1.0 is unchanged
pixel-for-pixel, and peak edge contrast on the Chrome icon goes from 60
to 99 at 1.25, 49 to 83 at 1.5, and 37 to 82 at 2.0 out of 255. The DVD
control bar was checked the same way.

Also records that Wonder Ink session-only cookies are confirmed working
on the endpoint, which settles the question 0.1.34 shipped as unverified
and tells us the session is in cookies rather than localStorage.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
2026-09-06 14:19:38 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5 0b2f99a853 feat: make Chrome a room appliance rather than somebody's browser
A classroom computer is shared. There is one local Chrome profile owned
by the room, teachers sign into websites, and nobody signs into Chrome.

BrowserSignin=0 stops Chrome asking who is using it, with SyncDisabled
set explicitly alongside it so the intent is in the file rather than
implied. BrowserAddPersonEnabled=false stops new profiles and
ProfilePickerOnStartupAvailability=1 stops the picker.

BrowserGuestModeEnabled=false is the answer to the other profile
switching entry point. Guest is the one that survives disabling add
person, and turning it off is the supported mechanism rather than hiding
UI. Guest is not the browsing model: the room needs one persistent
profile so the church YouTube login survives.

CookiesSessionOnlyForUrls scoped to [*.]wonderink.org, which covers
app.wonderink.org and every other subdomain, so a teacher's Wonder Ink
session does not outlive them. BackgroundModeEnabled was already false,
which is what lets a session actually end.

Every policy name was checked against the strings of the installed
Chrome 152 binary, with deliberately invalid names as a control so the
check is known to discriminate.

Two things are recorded honestly in docs/browser.md rather than claimed.
The avatar button stays in the toolbar — screenshotted with and without
these policies, it is in the same place either way; what changes is that
nothing behind it can create or switch a profile, and no Chrome 152
policy removes the button. And whether session-only cookies actually
sign Wonder Ink out is unverified: it needs a real Wonder Ink login,
which this machine does not have, and three attempts to prove the
mechanism against a local site were inconclusive because the positive
control never worked. The endpoint procedure to settle it, including how
to tell a cookie session from a localStorage one, is written down.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
2026-09-05 08:27:16 -05:00