fix: fail closed on production signup

Production configuration accepted publicSignupEnabled: true and started a
working Identity/API runtime, even though Ekklesia has no verified email,
invitation requirement, CAPTCHA, or durable shared/edge limiter — Doctor
merely reported "Public signup is explicitly ENABLED" as a pass.

validatePublicSignupEnabled now takes the same IdentityEnvironment the rest
of this config validates against and throws the stable
PUBLIC_SIGNUP_UNSUPPORTED_IN_PRODUCTION whenever the parsed value is true in
production. Parsing stays separate from the policy, so a malformed value
still reports PUBLIC_SIGNUP_ENABLED_INVALID everywhere. Because the
executable entry point validates configuration before startApi, such a
deployment fails before any pool, Better Auth instance, module runtime, or
listener exists, and Doctor reports NOT READY via its existing
IdentityConfigError path. Development and test composition still enable it
explicitly through the identical typed path.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
ekklesia
2026-07-26 15:58:08 -05:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent d3c6bd73d3
commit 1161f5a076
10 changed files with 293 additions and 53 deletions
+14 -3
View File
@@ -346,6 +346,15 @@ async function startConfiguredApi(
url: string,
options: StartConfiguredApiOptions = {},
): Promise<RunningApi> {
const publicSignupEnabled = options.publicSignupEnabled ?? true;
// Production configuration refuses to enable public signup at all until durable abuse controls
// exist (`PUBLIC_SIGNUP_UNSUPPORTED_IN_PRODUCTION`, `core/src/identity/config.ts`), so a scenario
// that creates accounts over HTTP must validate its configuration as development — the explicit,
// intended way to opt in. This changes only Ekklesia's own config-validation strictness:
// `environment` never reaches Better Auth, and this harness keeps the identical https,
// non-loopback base URL and trusted origins either way, so the production-equivalent origin/CSRF
// behavior ADR 0012 established is exercised exactly the same in both cases.
const environment = publicSignupEnabled ? "development" : "production";
const config = createApiRuntimeConfig(
{
...(options.clientAddress === undefined ? {} : { clientAddress: options.clientAddress }),
@@ -353,13 +362,13 @@ async function startConfiguredApi(
host: "127.0.0.1",
identity: {
baseUrl: identityBaseUrl,
publicSignupEnabled: options.publicSignupEnabled ?? true,
publicSignupEnabled,
secret: "integration-test-secret-0123456789abcdefgh",
trustedOrigins: [identityBaseUrl, dashboardOrigin],
},
port: 0,
},
{ environment: "production" },
{ environment },
);
return startApi(config, {
...("rateLimitOverride" in options
@@ -902,7 +911,9 @@ describe.sequential("live API — startup and migration guarantees", () => {
},
port: 0,
},
{ environment: "production" },
// Development validation, for the same reason `startConfiguredApi` documents: this scenario
// drives a real sign-up request, which production configuration refuses to enable at all.
{ environment: "development" },
);
const running = await startApi(config, { rateLimitOverride: { max: 1000, window: 1 } });
const origin = apiOrigin(running);