fix: harden identity HTTP transport

apps/api/tests/api-http.integration.ts

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 import { randomBytes } from "node:crypto";
+import { request as httpRequest } from "node:http";
 import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
 import path from "node:path";
 import {
@@ -9,7 +10,7 @@ import {
 import { mkdtemp, rm } from "node:fs/promises";
 import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
 import { Client, type QueryResultRow } from "pg";
-import { afterAll, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
+import { afterAll, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
 import { createApiRuntimeConfig } from "../src/config.js";
 import { startApi, type RunningApi } from "../src/server.js";
 
@@ -245,7 +246,12 @@ async function signUp(
 ): Promise<SignUpResult> {
   const response = await fetch(`${origin}/api/auth/sign-up/email`, {
     body: JSON.stringify({ email, name: "Integration Test User", password }),
-    headers: { "content-type": "application/json", ...headers },
+    // A trusted Origin by default, matching signIn below: Node's own fetch() (and every browser)
+    // automatically sends `Sec-Fetch-Mode: cors`, which Better Auth's first-login CSRF protection
+    // treats as "this is a Fetch-API call" and requires a trusted Origin/Referer for regardless of
+    // whether a cookie is present — see the dedicated no-Origin scenario below, which uses a raw
+    // `http.request` instead of `fetch()` to exercise a genuinely Fetch-Metadata-free caller.
+    headers: { "content-type": "application/json", origin: dashboardOrigin, ...headers },
     method: "POST",
   });
   return { body: (await response.clone().json()) as SignUpResult["body"], response };
@@ -283,6 +289,45 @@ async function fetchPrincipal(
   return { body: await response.clone().json(), response };
 }
 
+/**
+ * A raw `node:http` POST, deliberately not `fetch()`. Node's own `fetch()` (undici) — like every
+ * browser — automatically sends `Sec-Fetch-Mode: cors` on every request, which Better Auth's
+ * first-login CSRF protection (`formCsrfMiddleware`) treats as "this came from a Fetch-API
+ * client" and requires a trusted Origin/Referer for regardless of cookie presence. A genuine
+ * non-browser, non-Fetch server-to-server integration (curl, most backend HTTP client libraries,
+ * or this raw socket) sends none of the Fetch Metadata headers, so it is unaffected by that
+ * specific protection and needs no Origin header at all.
+ */
+function rawPostRequest(
+  origin: string,
+  requestPath: string,
+  body: unknown,
+): Promise<{ body: string; status: number }> {
+  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+    const url = new URL(requestPath, origin);
+    const payload = JSON.stringify(body);
+    const req = httpRequest(
+      url,
+      {
+        headers: {
+          "content-length": Buffer.byteLength(payload),
+          "content-type": "application/json",
+        },
+        method: "POST",
+      },
+      (res) => {
+        const chunks: Buffer[] = [];
+        res.on("data", (chunk) => chunks.push(chunk as Buffer));
+        res.on("end", () => {
+          resolve({ body: Buffer.concat(chunks).toString("utf8"), status: res.statusCode ?? 0 });
+        });
+      },
+    );
+    req.on("error", reject);
+    req.end(payload);
+  });
+}
+
 describe.sequential("live API — signup, sign-in, principal, sign-out", () => {
   let database: { name: string; url: string };
   let running: RunningApi;
@@ -495,9 +540,13 @@ describe.sequential("live API — signup, sign-in, principal, sign-out", () => {
     }
   });
 
-  it("supports a server-to-server sign-up request that carries no Origin header at all", async () => {
-    const { response } = await signUp(origin, "[email protected]", password);
-    expect(response.status).toBe(200);
+  it("supports a genuine server-to-server sign-up request that carries no Origin header and no Fetch Metadata headers at all", async () => {
+    const { status } = await rawPostRequest(origin, "/api/auth/sign-up/email", {
+      email: "[email protected]",
+      name: "Integration Test User",
+      password,
+    });
+    expect(status).toBe(200);
   });
 
   it("allows a trusted browser origin for the principal route with credentials", async () => {
@@ -517,6 +566,84 @@ describe.sequential("live API — signup, sign-in, principal, sign-out", () => {
     expect(principalResponse.headers.get("access-control-allow-origin")).toBeNull();
   });
 
+  // Production-equivalent Better Auth origin/CSRF protection (ADR 0012). Explicitly setting
+  // `advanced: { disableCSRFCheck: false, disableOriginCheck: false }` (`core/src/identity/runtime.ts`)
+  // removes Better Auth's own `isTest()`-driven default that otherwise silently skips origin/CSRF
+  // validation under a test runner, so the same behavior verified below is also what production
+  // enforces.
+
+  it("accepts a no-cookie first authentication attempt from a trusted browser origin", async () => {
+    const response = await fetch(`${origin}/api/auth/sign-in/email`, {
+      body: JSON.stringify({ email: emailOne, password }),
+      headers: { "content-type": "application/json", origin: dashboardOrigin },
+      method: "POST",
+    });
+
+    expect(response.status).toBe(200);
+    expect(response.headers.get("access-control-allow-origin")).toBe(dashboardOrigin);
+  });
+
+  it("rejects a no-cookie first authentication attempt from an untrusted browser origin", async () => {
+    const response = await fetch(`${origin}/api/auth/sign-in/email`, {
+      body: JSON.stringify({ email: emailOne, password }),
+      headers: { "content-type": "application/json", origin: untrustedOrigin },
+      method: "POST",
+    });
+    const text = await response.text();
+
+    expect(response.status).toBe(403);
+    expect(response.headers.get("access-control-allow-origin")).toBeNull();
+    expect(text).not.toContain(database.url);
+    expect(text.toLowerCase()).not.toContain("stack");
+  });
+
+  it("rejects a cookie-bearing state-changing request from an untrusted browser origin, and does not invalidate the session", async () => {
+    const { cookiePair } = await signIn(origin, emailOne, password);
+    expect(cookiePair).toBeDefined();
+
+    const response = await fetch(`${origin}/api/auth/sign-out`, {
+      body: "{}",
+      headers: {
+        "content-type": "application/json",
+        cookie: cookiePair as string,
+        origin: untrustedOrigin,
+      },
+      method: "POST",
+    });
+    const text = await response.text();
+
+    expect(response.status).toBe(403);
+    expect(response.headers.get("access-control-allow-origin")).toBeNull();
+    expect(text).not.toContain(database.url);
+    expect(text.toLowerCase()).not.toContain("stack");
+
+    // The forged/rejected sign-out must never have reached sign-out logic: the session presented
+    // alongside it must still be valid.
+    const { body } = await fetchPrincipal(origin, { cookie: cookiePair as string });
+    expect(body).toMatchObject({ kind: "authenticated" });
+  });
+
+  it("rejects a 7-character password as too short", async () => {
+    const { response } = await signUp(origin, "[email protected]", "1234567");
+    expect(response.status).toBe(400);
+  });
+
+  it("accepts an 8-character password", async () => {
+    const { response, body } = await signUp(origin, "[email protected]", "12345678");
+    expect(response.status).toBe(200);
+    expect(body.user.email).toBe("[email protected]");
+  });
+
+  it("accepts a 128-character password", async () => {
+    const { response } = await signUp(origin, "[email protected]", "a".repeat(128));
+    expect(response.status).toBe(200);
+  });
+
+  it("rejects a 129-character password as too long", async () => {
+    const { response } = await signUp(origin, "[email protected]", "a".repeat(129));
+    expect(response.status).toBe(400);
+  });
+
   it("leaves Better Auth's handler unavailable outside /api/auth/*", async () => {
     const response = await fetch(`${origin}/sign-in/email`, { method: "POST" });
     expect(response.status).toBe(404);
@@ -533,22 +660,6 @@ describe.sequential("live API — signup, sign-in, principal, sign-out", () => {
   });
 });
 
-// Better Auth's own server-side rejection of a cookie-bearing state-changing request from an
-// untrusted origin (403 INVALID_ORIGIN) was verified directly and repeatedly against this exact
-// pinned release and this exact compiled `apps/api` server — signup, sign-in, then a sign-out
-// attempt with the valid session cookie and an untrusted Origin header reliably returns 403, and
-// the presented session remains valid afterward — but only when driven by a plain Node script
-// against the running server. The identical scenario could not be made to reproduce reliably when
-// driven through Vitest specifically (the rejection silently does not fire), even in a single
-// isolated test with its own fresh database and API instance, and even with `NODE_ENV` forced to
-// `"production"` inside the test process. The cause was not pinned down to a documented,
-// reproducible contract inside the time available for this slice, so no automated assertion is
-// made for this specific request shape here rather than commit a flaky or misleading test. What
-// *is* covered by an automated test above is the layer this repository's own code owns: CORS
-// never returns `Access-Control-Allow-Origin` for an untrusted origin, which is the actual
-// browser-enforced boundary preventing a malicious page from reading a response. See ADR 0011 for
-// the full account, including the exact manual reproduction used.
-
 describe.sequential("live API — startup and migration guarantees", () => {
   it("does not create any tables or migration history when started against an unmigrated database", async () => {
     const database = await createDisposableDatabase("unmigrated");
@@ -629,3 +740,70 @@ describe.sequential("live API — principal infrastructure failure is never down
     await running.shutdown().catch(() => undefined);
   });
 });
+
+describe.sequential("live API — Better Auth logging never leaks operational detail", () => {
+  it("emits no raw exception, SQL, connection detail, origin header, or stack trace when a real identity database failure occurs", async () => {
+    const database = await createDisposableDatabase("logging_leak");
+    await applyCoreMigrations(database.url);
+    const running = await startMigratedApi(database.url);
+    const origin = apiOrigin(running);
+
+    await signUp(origin, "[email protected]", "correct horse battery staple");
+
+    // Force the database itself unreachable out from under the running API pool, then drive a
+    // request through Better Auth's own database-backed handler (not Ekklesia's own principal
+    // route) so Better Auth's internal logging — configured in `core/src/identity/runtime.ts` —
+    // is the thing actually being exercised here, not Core's own error handling. Without
+    // `onAPIError: { throw: true }`, the pinned release's own `better-call` transport dependency
+    // would catch this internally and print it raw via an unconditional
+    // `console.error("# SERVER_ERROR: ", error)` that no `logger` configuration can reach; with
+    // it, the failure instead propagates out of `auth.handler()` and becomes a sanitized
+    // `IdentityRuntimeError` at `handleAuthRequest`'s own boundary, and nothing is logged at all.
+    await dropDatabase(database.name);
+
+    const errorSpy = vi.spyOn(console, "error").mockImplementation(() => undefined);
+    const warnSpy = vi.spyOn(console, "warn").mockImplementation(() => undefined);
+    const logSpy = vi.spyOn(console, "log").mockImplementation(() => undefined);
+    try {
+      const response = await fetch(`${origin}/api/auth/sign-in/email`, {
+        body: JSON.stringify({
+          email: "[email protected]",
+          password: "correct horse battery staple",
+        }),
+        headers: { "content-type": "application/json", origin: dashboardOrigin },
+        method: "POST",
+      });
+      const body = await response.clone().json();
+
+      expect(response.status).not.toBe(200);
+      expect(body).toEqual({ code: "AUTH_REQUEST_FAILED" });
+
+      const emitted = [...errorSpy.mock.calls, ...warnSpy.mock.calls, ...logSpy.mock.calls]
+        .flat()
+        .map((value) =>
+          value instanceof Error ? `${value.message}\n${value.stack ?? ""}` : String(value),
+        )
+        .join("\n");
+
+      // The primary guarantee: onAPIError.throw routes this exact failure out to Core's own
+      // sanitized boundary before Better Auth (or its own transport dependency) ever gets a
+      // chance to log anything about it, so nothing is emitted at all.
+      expect(emitted).toBe("");
+      // Defense in depth, kept even though the assertion above is currently sufficient: if a
+      // future change causes something to be logged after all, it must still never contain any
+      // of this.
+      expect(emitted).not.toContain(database.url);
+      expect(emitted).not.toContain(database.name);
+      expect(emitted.toLowerCase()).not.toContain("password");
+      expect(emitted.toLowerCase()).not.toContain("stack");
+      expect(emitted).not.toMatch(/select|insert|update|delete|drizzle/iu);
+      expect(emitted).not.toContain(dashboardOrigin);
+      expect(emitted).not.toContain(identityBaseUrl);
+    } finally {
+      errorSpy.mockRestore();
+      warnSpy.mockRestore();
+      logSpy.mockRestore();
+      await running.shutdown().catch(() => undefined);
+    }
+  });
+});

apps/api/tests/lifecycle.test.ts

@@ -11,6 +11,84 @@ vi.mock("better-auth", () => ({ betterAuth: betterAuthMock }));
 vi.mock("better-auth/adapters/drizzle", () => ({ drizzleAdapter: drizzleAdapterMock }));
 vi.mock("@hono/node-server", () => ({ serve: serveMock }));
 
+import { createApiRuntimeConfig } from "../src/config.js";
+import { installShutdownSignalHandlers, startApi } from "../src/server.js";
+
+function validConfig() {
+  return createApiRuntimeConfig(
+    {
+      databaseUrl: "postgresql://ekklesia:[email protected]:5432/ekklesia",
+      host: "127.0.0.1",
+      identity: {
+        baseUrl: "https://identity.example.test",
+        secret: "correct-horse-battery-staple-0123456789",
+        trustedOrigins: ["https://identity.example.test"],
+      },
+      port: 0,
+    },
+    { environment: "production" },
+  );
+}
+
+/** A minimal fake `ServerType`: enough of Node's `http.Server` shape for `bindServer`/`shutdown`
+ * to drive without a real socket. `close` and `once` are spies so tests can assert call counts;
+ * `triggerError` simulates the server's own `'error'` event (e.g. a bind failure). */
+function fakeServer() {
+  let errorHandler: ((error: Error) => void) | undefined;
+  const server = {
+    address: () => ({ address: "127.0.0.1", family: "IPv4", port: 4_000 }),
+    close: vi.fn((callback?: () => void) => {
+      callback?.();
+      return server;
+    }),
+    listening: true,
+    once: vi.fn((event: string, handler: (error: Error) => void) => {
+      if (event === "error") {
+        errorHandler = handler;
+      }
+      return server;
+    }),
+  };
+  return {
+    server,
+    triggerError: (error: Error) => errorHandler?.(error),
+  };
+}
+
+/** Resolves the listening callback asynchronously, matching real `@hono/node-server` behavior
+ * (the callback fires on the `listening` event, after `serve()` itself has already returned) —
+ * resolving synchronously would reference `bindServer`'s own `server` const before it is
+ * initialized. */
+function mockSuccessfulServe() {
+  const { server, triggerError } = fakeServer();
+  serveMock.mockImplementation((_options: unknown, listeningListener?: () => void) => {
+    queueMicrotask(() => listeningListener?.());
+    return server;
+  });
+  return { server, triggerError };
+}
+
+function mockFailingServe(error: Error) {
+  const { server, triggerError } = fakeServer();
+  serveMock.mockImplementation(() => {
+    queueMicrotask(() => triggerError(error));
+    return server;
+  });
+  return server;
+}
+
+/** Captures signal handlers registered via `process.on` without ever installing a real one, so a
+ * test can trigger "SIGINT"/"SIGTERM" by calling the captured function directly. */
+function mockProcessOn(): { handlers: Record<string, () => void>; restore: () => void } {
+  const handlers: Record<string, () => void> = {};
+  const fake = vi.fn((event: string, handler: () => void) => {
+    handlers[event] = handler;
+    return process;
+  });
+  const onSpy = vi.spyOn(process, "on").mockImplementation(fake as unknown as typeof process.on);
+  return { handlers, restore: () => onSpy.mockRestore() };
+}
+
 describe("Ekklesia API import safety", () => {
   const originalEnv = { ...process.env };
   const originalProcessOn = process.on.bind(process);
@@ -73,3 +151,115 @@ describe("Ekklesia API import safety", () => {
     expect(serveMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
   });
 });
+
+describe("Ekklesia API shutdown lifecycle", () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    poolConstructor.mockReset();
+    betterAuthMock.mockReset();
+    drizzleAdapterMock.mockClear();
+    serveMock.mockReset();
+  });
+
+  it("makes every concurrent shutdown caller await the exact same server-close and pool-close, each exactly once", async () => {
+    const poolEnd = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+    poolConstructor.mockImplementation(function fakePool() {
+      return { end: poolEnd, on: vi.fn() };
+    });
+    betterAuthMock.mockReturnValue({ api: { getSession: vi.fn() }, handler: vi.fn() });
+    const { server } = mockSuccessfulServe();
+
+    const running = await startApi(validConfig());
+
+    await Promise.all([running.shutdown(), running.shutdown(), running.shutdown()]);
+
+    expect(server.close).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(poolEnd).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+  });
+
+  it("keeps shutdown idempotent for calls made after the first has already resolved", async () => {
+    const poolEnd = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+    poolConstructor.mockImplementation(function fakePool() {
+      return { end: poolEnd, on: vi.fn() };
+    });
+    betterAuthMock.mockReturnValue({ api: { getSession: vi.fn() }, handler: vi.fn() });
+    const { server } = mockSuccessfulServe();
+
+    const running = await startApi(validConfig());
+    await running.shutdown();
+    await running.shutdown();
+
+    expect(server.close).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(poolEnd).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+  });
+
+  it("closes an already-created database pool when identity construction fails during startup", async () => {
+    const poolEnd = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+    poolConstructor.mockImplementation(function fakePool() {
+      return { end: poolEnd, on: vi.fn() };
+    });
+    betterAuthMock.mockImplementation(() => {
+      throw new Error("postgresql://admin:[email protected]/x");
+    });
+
+    await expect(startApi(validConfig())).rejects.toMatchObject({
+      code: "IDENTITY_CONSTRUCTION_FAILED",
+    });
+
+    expect(poolEnd).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(serveMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("closes an already-created database pool when the server fails to bind its listen address", async () => {
+    const poolEnd = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+    poolConstructor.mockImplementation(function fakePool() {
+      return { end: poolEnd, on: vi.fn() };
+    });
+    betterAuthMock.mockReturnValue({ api: { getSession: vi.fn() }, handler: vi.fn() });
+    mockFailingServe(new Error("EADDRINUSE"));
+
+    await expect(startApi(validConfig())).rejects.toThrow();
+
+    expect(poolEnd).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+  });
+
+  it("wires SIGINT/SIGTERM to the same shutdown lifecycle and only calls the injected exit, never the real process.exit", async () => {
+    const { handlers, restore } = mockProcessOn();
+    const shutdown = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+    const exit = vi.fn();
+
+    installShutdownSignalHandlers({ shutdown }, exit);
+
+    expect(handlers.SIGINT).toEqual(expect.any(Function));
+    expect(handlers.SIGTERM).toEqual(expect.any(Function));
+
+    handlers.SIGINT?.();
+    await Promise.resolve();
+    await Promise.resolve();
+
+    expect(shutdown).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(exit).toHaveBeenCalledWith(0);
+
+    // A second signal after the first must not trigger a second shutdown.
+    handlers.SIGTERM?.();
+    await Promise.resolve();
+    expect(shutdown).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(exit).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+    restore();
+  });
+
+  it("exits with a failure code, without throwing, when signal-triggered shutdown itself fails", async () => {
+    const { handlers, restore } = mockProcessOn();
+    const shutdown = vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error("pool close failed"));
+    const exit = vi.fn();
+
+    installShutdownSignalHandlers({ shutdown }, exit);
+    handlers.SIGTERM?.();
+    await Promise.resolve();
+    await Promise.resolve();
+
+    expect(exit).toHaveBeenCalledWith(1);
+
+    restore();
+  });
+});