feat: give every Ekklesia screen one set of design tokens and elements

Modules have owned their own UI since ADR 0021, but the platform has never
said what that UI should look like. Every screen here — the Dashboard shell,
the display host, the module template — invented its own hex colours, font
stack, spacing, and radii, and they already disagreed. A module author had no
vocabulary for "the ordinary panel background", so the only available answer
was to invent one, and two modules would invent two.

Add `@ekklesia/design-tokens`: one validated, enumerable registry of semantic
tokens. A token declares a name, label, description, and default value; its
category and `--ekklesia-*` identifier are derived from the name, so it can
never claim one category while being named for another. Construction rejects
duplicates, malformed names, unknown categories, empty or overlong text, and
any value that is not a bounded literal — no declaration terminator, rule
block, comment, at-rule, `url(`, `!important`, escape, control character, or
markup. A registry that constructs can therefore be emitted as CSS without
escaping, because nothing needing escaping can be in it. That validation is
also what makes a future theme editor implementable rather than aspirational.

Add `@ekklesia/ui`: button, icon button, text input, select, checkbox, field
wrapper, panel, dialog, tabs, table and list primitives, badge, toast, and
empty/error/loading states — every value a token reference, with real
`:focus-visible` treatment and status that never depends on colour alone.
Deliberately small: an element earns its place when two consumers need it.

The stylesheet is a string rather than a `.css` file so the identical bytes
install into a document or an isolated artifact root, and so hover, disabled,
and focus-visible are real CSS rather than JavaScript approximations of them.

`pnpm boundaries` opens exactly two shared roles to modules, by name — every
other role stays rejected — and pins both design packages to the bottom of the
presentation stack. Both are browser-safe by construction, proven by a real
compile of module-shaped source in which `process.env` must fail to typecheck.

The shell installs the defaults at its document root for the Dashboard and the
display; custom properties inherit into module artifacts, so a module reads
`var(--ekklesia-…)` with nothing to import at run time and nothing for a host
to forget to pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
ekklesia
2026-08-27 06:59:44 -05:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent b14613decd
commit e03d38fcab
64 changed files with 3697 additions and 105 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
# 0039: Shared design tokens and foundational elements
- Status: Accepted
- Date: 2026-08-27
- Supersedes: none
- Related: [ADR 0021](0021-modules-as-hostable-products.md),
[ADR 0022](0022-module-ui-authoring-and-host-contract.md),
[ADR 0024](0024-browser-safe-ui-sdk-and-host-loader.md),
[ADR 0026](0026-minimal-ekklesia-module-ui-host.md),
[ADR 0033](0033-display-kiosk-host-contract.md)
## Context
ADR 0021 made a module an independently versioned product that owns its own UI, and ADR 0022 chose
React as the way to author it. Since then the platform has been able to *mount* a module's screen but
has said nothing at all about what that screen should look like. The consequences are now concrete:
- Every screen in this repository — the Dashboard shell, the display host, the module template —
hardcodes its own hex colours, font stack, spacing, and radii. They already disagree with each
other.
- A module author has no vocabulary for "the ordinary panel background" or "the danger text colour",
so the only available answer is to invent one. Two modules will invent two.
- Deferred repeatedly and named in ADR 0022, ADR 0023, and ADR 0033's deferral lists: "a design
system, component library, or theme/design-token contract."
- A theme editor is a real product requirement for a church platform, and it is only implementable
if the values it would edit are enumerable with human-readable names — which is a property of the
*contract*, not something that can be retrofitted onto a pile of literals.
The constraint that shapes everything below is ADR 0024's browser boundary. Whatever the shared
design layer is, module UI imports it, so it must not be able to pull a backend type graph — and with
it Node's global declarations — into a browser program.
## Decision
Add two shared browser-safe packages and open exactly two boundary roles to module UI.
### `@ekklesia/design-tokens` — the semantic token registry
A dependency-free package (like `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk`, and for the same reason) holding one
validated registry of **semantic** tokens: `background.page`, `text.danger`, `state.hover-background`,
`typography.size-heading-1`, and so on. Nothing is named for the colour it currently happens to be,
because the point is that a value can change without a consumer's meaning changing with it.
Each token declares a name, a human-readable label, a description, and a default value. Its
**category and CSS custom-property name are derived** from the name rather than declared, so a token
can never claim one category while being named for another, and there is exactly one spelling of
`--ekklesia-<name>`. That is what makes the registry enumerable: a future theme editor reads
`list()`, groups by `category`, labels each field with `label`, explains it with `description`, and
needs no second source of truth.
Construction validates every rule rather than leaving it to review: an invalid or single-segment
name, an unknown category, a malformed derived identifier, an empty or overlong label or description,
a duplicate name, and a value that is not a **bounded literal** each throw. A value may not contain a
declaration terminator, a rule block, a comment, an at-rule, `url(`, `!important`, a backslash
escape, a control character, or markup, and is length-bounded. A registry that constructs is
therefore a registry that can be emitted as CSS without escaping, because nothing needing escaping
can be in it.
The registry emits its defaults as one CSS rule, scoped to `:root` or `:host` — a closed set, never a
caller-supplied selector, since an arbitrary selector string is exactly the unbounded value the
package refuses everywhere else.
### `@ekklesia/ui` — the foundational elements
A small React package whose every colour, type, spacing, radius, shadow, and interaction state is a
`var(--ekklesia-…)` reference. It contains the set a real module dashboard cannot be built without:
button and icon button, text input, select, checkbox, field wrapper, panel, dialog, tabs, table and
list primitives, badge, toast presentation, and empty/error/loading states, with `:focus-visible`
focus treatment on every interactive element.
Each element is a thin, accessible shell over the real HTML element rather than a re-implementation
of it, so native attributes, form association, and assistive-technology semantics pass straight
through. **This is deliberately not a large catalogue**: an element earns its place when two
independent consumers need the same one.
**Status is never signalled by colour alone.** Every status family carries a symbol token beside its
colours, and the elements render it. A status that is only red is invisible to a person who cannot
distinguish it, and unreadable on a projector or a washed-out lobby screen (WCAG 2.2 §1.4.1).
### The stylesheet is a string, not a `.css` file
These elements are mounted in two very different places: a document (the Dashboard shell, a
standalone host page) and an isolated root (a module's own artifact). A `.css` file would need a
bundler on both sides and a served asset on one of them. A string is installed into whichever root
the caller actually has, with identical bytes — and it is what lets `:focus-visible`, `:hover`, and
`:disabled` be real CSS rather than JavaScript approximations of them, which is the difference
between a focus treatment that works for a keyboard user and one that only looks like it does.
`<EkklesiaUiStyles />` renders that string into whichever root its React tree lives in. There is
deliberately no `document.head` hoisting and no `precedence` attribute: hoisting an isolated
artifact's styles into the host document is precisely the leak the platform must not have.
### Modules consume tokens; they never invent global ones
A module may reference any registered token and may derive **private, differently-prefixed aliases**
from them inside its own artifact. A module may not define an `--ekklesia-*` custom property: that
would add a global theme variable outside the registry, which a theme editor could never enumerate
and another module could unknowingly depend on. The typed `designToken(name)` reference makes an
unregistered name a compile error and a runtime failure.
### The boundary opens by name, not by category
`pnpm boundaries` adds `design-tokens` and `ui` to the shared roles a module may depend on. It is a
named allowlist, not "browser-safe shared packages are fine": `api-client`, `auth-client`,
`surface-sdk`, and `module-ui-host` all stay rejected for modules, and `contracts`/`module-sdk`
remain excluded from surfaces for the reason ADR 0024 measured.
The two new packages are pinned at the bottom of the presentation stack by their own rule:
`design-tokens` may depend on nothing but dev-time tooling, and `ui` may depend on `design-tokens`
and dev-time tooling. A design package that could reach an API client would put that client inside
every module artifact that renders a button.
### The host installs the theme once, at its root
`surfaces/shell` installs the default token values at the document for both the Dashboard and the
display application. CSS custom properties inherit through a shadow boundary, so every module
artifact — including one mounted in an isolated root — reads `var(--ekklesia-…)` without the host
reaching into the artifact or the artifact importing the host.
## Consequences
- Two packages exist where none did; both are browser-safe by construction and proven so by a real
compile of module-shaped source under the exact project a module uses for UI, where `process.env`
must fail to typecheck.
- The Dashboard shell and display host no longer hardcode a colour, and a module can match them.
- A theme editor becomes implementable without a contract change: the values it would edit are
already enumerable, labelled, described, categorised, and validated.
- A module now has more it *may* import. The allowlist is exactly two roles and is enforced, with
fixtures proving both the acceptance and the continued rejection of everything else.
- Every module artifact bundles its own copy of the elements, exactly as it already bundles React
(ADR 0023). That cost is accepted for now and is optimisable later without a contract change,
because the contract is still a mount function.
## Alternatives
- **Ship a full design system.** Rejected: a large catalogue is a large maintenance and review
surface, and most of it would be speculative. The set here is what a real module dashboard needs.
- **Put the tokens in `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk`.** Rejected: that package is the *host contract*, and
a host that renders nothing still has to satisfy it. Design values are not something a host
supplies, and merging them would make the mount ABI carry a theme.
- **Expose tokens through `ModuleUiHostContext`.** Rejected: a host handing a module a token map
makes every module re-implement styling from data, and makes the tokens a runtime negotiation
rather than inherited CSS. Custom properties already inherit into artifacts for free.
- **Ship a `.css` file.** Rejected for this pass: it forces a bundler and a served asset on every
consumer, including the isolated artifacts that most need the styles. A *module's own* stylesheets
are a separate question — the module's build already exists to compile them — and are decided by
their own ADR.
- **A theme editor now.** Deferred deliberately. The registry is the prerequisite; the editor needs
persistence, an authorization story, per-installation overrides, and a preview surface, none of
which exist.
## Deferred
A theme editor, a brand builder, per-installation persisted overrides, a dark theme or any second
theme, density modes, an icon set, charting, layout primitives beyond what the elements need, a
documentation site, and a focus-trap utility.
+1
View File
@@ -47,3 +47,4 @@ ADRs capture durable choices that affect more than one package or phase.
- [0036: A display device is its own principal, paired by an administrator](0036-managed-device-identity-and-pairing.md) — Accepted
- [0037: Outbound email is a host-provided transport, and SMTP is its first provider](0037-host-provided-outbound-email.md) — Accepted
- [0038: Email verification and password recovery, with a trusted-bootstrap exception](0038-email-verification-and-password-recovery.md) — Accepted
- [0039: Shared design tokens and foundational elements](0039-shared-design-tokens-and-elements.md) — Accepted
+22 -3
View File
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ These rules map platform ownership to filesystem and package boundaries. The exe
| --- | --- | --- |
| `apps/*` | Thin deployable composition roots | Public Core APIs, generated bootstrap, or a surface as required by the app |
| `core` | Feature-agnostic platform implementations | Public contracts and external infrastructure libraries |
| `modules/*` | Domain capability, data, and the module's own UI | Module SDK, module UI SDK, public contracts, React, and external backend libraries |
| `modules/*` | Domain capability, data, and the module's own UI | Module SDK, module UI SDK, the approved design packages, public contracts, React, and external backend libraries |
| `surfaces/*` | The application shell, UI, renderers, navigation, and interaction | Surface SDK, API/auth clients, the module UI SDK and host loader, design packages, and a browser framework |
| `builders/*` | Declarative surface composition tooling | Builder/surface SDKs and public contracts |
| `packages/*` | Explicitly scoped SDKs, contracts, clients, design, testing, or tooling | Only dependencies appropriate to the package's declared level |
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ These rules map platform ownership to filesystem and package boundaries. The exe
module may therefore contain `.tsx` source and depend on `react`, `react-dom`, and
`@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk`. It still cannot contain `.jsx`, stylesheets, single-file components,
Astro/Marko/MDX/HTML views, or SVG presentation assets, and cannot depend on any other UI framework
(including `react-router-dom`, `react-native`, and `@vitejs/plugin-react`) or on shared UI-role
packages. A module needs no bundler plugin: `@ekklesia/module-ui-build` — a `tooling` package,
(including `react-router-dom`, `react-native`, and `@vitejs/plugin-react`) or on any shared role
beyond the two approved design packages named below. A module needs no bundler plugin: `@ekklesia/module-ui-build` — a `tooling` package,
a role modules could already depend on — owns the entire module UI build
([ADR 0023](decisions/0023-module-ui-build-pipeline.md)). An unsupported framework aliased behind an allowed name is resolved and rejected by its
real target.
@@ -31,6 +31,21 @@ These rules map platform ownership to filesystem and package boundaries. The exe
import Core, an app, a surface, a builder, or another module. It also may not import
`@ekklesia/module-ui-host`: that package is host infrastructure, and a module bundling the loader
would blur the author/host split ([ADR 0024](decisions/0024-browser-safe-ui-sdk-and-host-loader.md)).
- A module may consume exactly two shared **design** roles: `design-tokens` (`@ekklesia/design-tokens`)
and `ui` (`@ekklesia/ui`), added by
[ADR 0039](decisions/0039-shared-design-tokens-and-elements.md). This is a named allowlist, not a
general "browser-safe shared packages are fine" relaxation: `api-client`, `auth-client`,
`surface-sdk`, and `module-ui-host` remain rejected inside a module. Both approved packages are
browser-safe by construction — `design-tokens` has no dependencies at all and `ui` depends only on
it — so a module UI file that imports them still cannot typecheck `process.env`, proven by a real
compile under the exact browser project a module uses. Both are also pinned at the bottom of the
presentation stack by `design-packages-depend-downward-only`: neither may reach an implementation
layer, an API/auth client, or the backend contracts barrel, because a design package that could
would put all of it inside every module artifact that renders a button.
- A module **references** registered global semantic tokens and may derive private,
differently-prefixed aliases from them inside its own artifact. It may never define an
`--ekklesia-*` custom property: that would invent a global theme variable outside the registry,
which a future theme editor could not enumerate and another module could unknowingly depend on.
- `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk` has no dependencies at all, and `@ekklesia/module-ui-host` depends only
on it. Both are browser-safe by construction: neither can pull a backend type graph — and with it
Node's global declarations — into browser code. Core still owns the containing
@@ -96,6 +111,10 @@ These rules map platform ownership to filesystem and package boundaries. The exe
direct table imports and foreign keys. Modules may not import another module's Drizzle tables,
columns, relations, schema entrypoint, or migration internals.
The design packages are covered the same way: one fixture proves a module may depend on both, one
proves every other shared role stays rejected, and one proves neither design package may depend
upward.
The boundary test suite includes intentionally invalid fixture graphs. This proves that the guard
rejects every currently machine-checkable repository rule even before production packages fill
every directory. The UI guard rejects component, view, template, stylesheet, shared UI-role, and