feat: add a host-provided outbound email transport
Ekklesia could authenticate people and pair devices but could not send a single message. Better Auth has been configured with emailAndPassword since ADR 0011 and neither of its mail hooks — sendResetPassword and emailVerification.sendVerificationEmail — was ever implemented, so email verification, password recovery, and invitations were all blocked on the same missing thing. That missing thing is a transport, not a Google Workspace integration. Email is now a host-provided infrastructure service with a provider seam, shaped exactly like object storage: feature code says "send this transactional message" and the provider owns the host, port, TLS, credentials, connection behaviour, and every transport error. No provider's hostname appears anywhere in Core, and a test asserts it. Google Workspace SMTP Relay is the expected first deployment and a compatibility target — the same variables address Microsoft 365, a transactional provider, or a local Postfix. The contract is deliberately tiny: one recipient or a small bounded list, a subject, text and/or HTML, an optional reply-to, and nothing else. There is no `from` field at all — the sender is host configuration, so no feature and no future module can choose who mail appears to come from, which is how a platform otherwise acquires an impersonation primitive. Control characters are refused rather than stripped in addresses, display names, subjects, and reply-to values; writing that rule down was not enough, because the first implementation trimmed an address before checking it and silently accepted a trailing carriage return until a test caught it. Security modes are named rather than inferred from a boolean and a port, which is genuinely ambiguous: `secure: false` on 587 means "connect in the clear and hope STARTTLS is offered". `starttls` sets requireTLS so a stripped upgrade fails the send instead of continuing in plaintext, production refuses `plaintext` outright, and certificate verification has no off switch. Credentials are optional as a pair, because a relay authorized by source IP has neither and requiring them would make the intended production arrangement unconfigurable; half a pair fails loudly. Connection, greeting, and socket timeouts are all explicit — the object-storage pass already showed what a network client on library defaults does to a request. Nothing retries: a failure after the message data has gone out is ambiguous, and retrying it turns one password-reset request into several emails, so this is a single bounded attempt and deliberately not an exactly-once promise. Email stays optional. An installation with no SMTP host is a complete deployment, nothing sends at startup, and constructing the transport opens no socket. There is no POST /api/v1/send-email and no route that touches the provider — an authenticated send endpoint is an open relay with extra steps. Modules get nothing either; services are added one at a time when something real needs one, and nothing does yet. Proven against a real in-process SMTP server rather than a mock: delivery with the host's sender on the wire, authentication and its sanitized refusal, a rejected mailbox distinguished from an outage, a refused connection, a silent server hitting its deadline, and a starttls transport refusing to continue when the upgrade is not offered. No test sends real email and no live credential exists in this repository or in CI. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
ba32499456
commit
fa3021e49b
@@ -279,6 +279,32 @@ wins, so a browser holding both remains a person.
|
||||
`/api/v1/principal` reports a device as `anonymous` on purpose. It is the endpoint the Dashboard uses
|
||||
to decide whether a person is signed in, and a device is not one.
|
||||
|
||||
## Outbound email and the verification seam
|
||||
|
||||
Ekklesia has a host-provided SMTP transport
|
||||
([ADR 0037](../architecture/decisions/0037-host-provided-outbound-email.md), see
|
||||
[Outbound email](email.md)) — but **no identity flow uses it yet.**
|
||||
|
||||
Better Auth exposes exactly two hooks for the flows that need mail, and this repository configures
|
||||
neither:
|
||||
|
||||
| hook | flow |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| `emailAndPassword.sendResetPassword({ user, url, token })` | Password reset |
|
||||
| `emailVerification.sendVerificationEmail({ user, url, token })` | Email verification |
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 7C Pass 2 implements them over the mail transport. `startApi` already constructs the provider
|
||||
and closes it on every shutdown path, so the remaining work is to inject it into
|
||||
`createIdentityRuntime` and write the two message bodies.
|
||||
|
||||
**The `url` and `token` those hooks receive are credentials.** The entire security of both flows is
|
||||
that only the recipient sees them, so they must never be logged, never appear in an error, and never
|
||||
reach a diagnostic. The transport already logs nothing and refuses to echo a message body.
|
||||
|
||||
Until that pass lands: email verification, password recovery, and invitations do not exist, and
|
||||
`requireEmailVerification` stays off — turning it on without a working sender would lock every
|
||||
account out.
|
||||
|
||||
## Creating the first platform owner
|
||||
|
||||
A fresh installation has a login page and nothing to log in to. Public registration is disabled by
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user