2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	c444ff570b	feat: let one module contribute a browser renderer to another's capability ... The platform has had a complete story for one module using another's *backend* since ADR 0006 — capabilities, versioned ranges, provider registration. It has had none at all for one module using another's *browser* code, and every workaround is wrong in a way that matters: a consumer cannot import a peer module, it cannot re-implement a renderer for a domain it does not own, and a second `entrypoints` role would put the platform in charge of deciding when a slot inside someone else's screen should be filled. Add a generic browser contribution. `manifestVersion: 7` declares one: namespaced id, its own version, a target capability, a compatible range, and one artifact. That is the complete list, and the omissions are the decision — no payload schema, slot, ordering, or rendering hint exists anywhere, so Core cannot learn what a slide is because the declaration cannot express it. Discovery resolves a contribution artifact through the *identical* loop every other compiled entrypoint uses, inheriting the path, containment, symlink, extension, and file-kind checks rather than getting a weaker copy of them. The registry publishes one only when another eligible module provides the target capability within the declared range; otherwise it is absent rather than mounted and broken. `apps/api` serves it as a sibling of the artifact and display routes, with the same policy: three lookup keys, one exact match, one already-validated path, and one indistinguishable 404 for unknown, undeclared, stale, and incompatible alike. A consumer discovers through the host, never through a URL. Its descriptor carries identity, version, and capability; the URL stays server-side and is resolved exactly as `api.request("records")` is. A module can only ever see contributions aimed at a capability it itself provides, and cannot name its way to anything else — a mount for a withheld id fails without fetching. The consumer owns the domain contract entirely. Input is opaque JSON, checked structurally so a Date, a function, a cycle, or `undefined` fails at the boundary rather than vanishing somewhere far from the mistake, and checked for nothing else. A contributed renderer receives its own id and that input: no API client, realtime, principal, configuration, database, storage, or credential. Loading one grants its module nothing. The contribution ABI is versioned separately from the module UI ABI, because the two have different shapes and lifecycles and coupling them would force every module to rebuild whenever either moved. It supports asynchronous readiness, update-without-remount (a screen that remounted per tick would restart animations and reload media), deterministic cleanup in a `finally`, and sanitized failure that never carries the consumer's domain data. Each renderer mounts in its own isolated root with its own stylesheet. The template now declares a contribution, so `pnpm build` exercises the whole authoring path, and the shell suite drives the full relationship — one module discovering, mounting, updating, and unmounting another's React renderer with neither importing the other. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-27 07:47:10 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	80189c8ae2	feat: give display devices their own paired identity ... ADR 0033 gave Ekklesia a display host and ADR 0034 gave it a login page. Together, the only way to light a television in a foyer was to sign a human being into it and leave that session running on a screen anyone can walk up to: a person's credentials on a wall, a person's session as the thing signage depends on, and the display going dark when they are revoked or their session simply expires. A screen is not a person. Ekklesia now recognizes three principal classes — anonymous, authenticated human, and managed device — and a device is a first-class principal with its own credential and its own explicit permissions. It has no email, no password, and no row in the identity tables, and it satisfies the `authenticated` baseline never, so every route that settles for "somebody is signed in" stays closed to it. Device permissions live in their own table because ekklesia_core_grant.user_id is a non-null foreign key into the user table and making it polymorphic would rewrite the platform's central authorization record to serve one narrow case. That is a schema decision, not a second decision point: the evaluator gained one branch, so a device is allowed or denied by the same function, with the same deny-by-default, as anyone else — with no owner path it could reach and no baseline that stands in for a grant. The six-digit code is not the credential. It is printed across a screen in a public hallway, so it is treated as public: it identifies a request to an administrator and is worth nothing alone. Collecting the credential also requires a 256-bit claim secret held only in the requesting browser's HttpOnly cookie, and approving requires the restricted core.devices.manage permission. Without that split, reading a code off a wall would hand over the screen's identity. The permission a pairing asks for is read from the module's validated display declaration, never from the request, so a browser cannot ask to be granted core.devices.manage or another module's permission. Approval grants exactly that one permission. Credentials are stored only as SHA-256; the raw value exists in the Set-Cookie that issues it and the device's own cookie jar, and is never logged, returned in JSON, or placed in a URL. The cookie is HttpOnly, so the module display code running in that same page cannot read it. Revocation is a server-side column checked on every principal resolution, and re-pairing mints a new identity so an old credential can never come back. State transitions are conditional updates, so one code cannot be approved twice or claimed into two credentials under a race. /api/v1/principal still reports a device as anonymous: it is what the Dashboard uses to decide whether a person is signed in. Displays read their viewer from the descriptor instead, which already performed the authorization — so displays are descriptor-first while the Dashboard stays principal-first, and neither infers an identity by elimination. Proven end to end against real PostgreSQL and real HTTP: an unpaired screen shows a code, an owner approves it, the device opens the display descriptor and a realtime stream, and revocation closes both while the device still holds its cookie. An already-open SSE stream is bounded by realtime's existing five-minute reconnect rather than closed instantly, and that bound is documented rather than called immediate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-23 23:41:03 -05:00