11 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5	f63f80f2f0	feat: support split Dashboard and API origins (ADR 0045) ... An installation can now serve the Dashboard and the API on sibling hostnames (dash./api.) beside the default same-origin topology, from one image and with configuration alone. - The Dashboard learns its API origin at run time: the built page carries one empty <meta name="ekklesia-api-origin">, which the API fills with its identity base URL's origin at startup, before computing the page's ETag. The shell accepts only a canonical http(s) origin and otherwise fails closed without making a request. The build-time EKKLESIA_API_BASE_URL is gone from the bundle; the development server injects the same element. - The display host stays on the API's origin, so its device cookies, requests, and offline cache are unchanged. - The API trusts its own origin (trusted origins plus the identity base URL), as Better Auth already does, so the display page's mutations pass the origin check without operators listing it. - Doctor validates EKKLESIA_DASHBOARD_ORIGIN exactly as the API's startup does (it previously skipped it), reports the topology without printing hostnames, and warns when split hostnames are not siblings. - The module UI contract states the CORS header limit (safelisted headers plus Content-Type, safelisted response headers only). - Reference deployment: Caddyfile.split.example (Dashboard hostname serves / and its script; API hostname serves /api/*, /display/*, and the display script; each refuses the other's paths) and EKKLESIA_DASHBOARD_HOSTNAME in the proxy overlay and env examples. - The deploy smoke test runs either topology (CI runs both). The split run installs the module template as a test-only module, checks per-hostname routing and exact CORS, then drives a digest-pinned headless Chromium over the DevTools protocol, with no added dependency: sign-in on the Dashboard hostname, the session cookie host-only on the API hostname, the module UI imported cross-origin and its credentialed request succeeding, the display and its service worker on the API hostname, and sign-out. ADR 0045 is marked Accepted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-03 14:47:36 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5	7cbe4e1b2c	chore(release): prepare 0.1.1 and accept ADR 0044 ... Bump the root and every platform workspace package from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1, so the platform reports the version the v0.1.1 tag will carry. Module discovery checks compatibility.platform against the root version and compatibility.moduleSdk against @ekklesia/module-sdk; both stay inside every existing ^0.1.0 range, so no module needs a new range. Everything since v0.1.0 is additive (health endpoints, Dashboard serving, production dependency declarations, the deployment image and Compose project). templates/module keeps 0.1.0: it is a module, versioned on its own, and its manifest, source, and tests carry its own product version. Mark ADR 0044 Accepted. Slices 1-4 are implemented and proven by CI's image build and deploy smoke; slice 6 (scheduled backups and the restore procedure) remains its open item. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-03 10:03:33 -05:00
ekklesia	3ca6b2cb32	feat: expose canonical module display URLs	2026-09-30 18:20:40 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	c444ff570b	feat: let one module contribute a browser renderer to another's capability ... The platform has had a complete story for one module using another's *backend* since ADR 0006 — capabilities, versioned ranges, provider registration. It has had none at all for one module using another's *browser* code, and every workaround is wrong in a way that matters: a consumer cannot import a peer module, it cannot re-implement a renderer for a domain it does not own, and a second `entrypoints` role would put the platform in charge of deciding when a slot inside someone else's screen should be filled. Add a generic browser contribution. `manifestVersion: 7` declares one: namespaced id, its own version, a target capability, a compatible range, and one artifact. That is the complete list, and the omissions are the decision — no payload schema, slot, ordering, or rendering hint exists anywhere, so Core cannot learn what a slide is because the declaration cannot express it. Discovery resolves a contribution artifact through the *identical* loop every other compiled entrypoint uses, inheriting the path, containment, symlink, extension, and file-kind checks rather than getting a weaker copy of them. The registry publishes one only when another eligible module provides the target capability within the declared range; otherwise it is absent rather than mounted and broken. `apps/api` serves it as a sibling of the artifact and display routes, with the same policy: three lookup keys, one exact match, one already-validated path, and one indistinguishable 404 for unknown, undeclared, stale, and incompatible alike. A consumer discovers through the host, never through a URL. Its descriptor carries identity, version, and capability; the URL stays server-side and is resolved exactly as `api.request("records")` is. A module can only ever see contributions aimed at a capability it itself provides, and cannot name its way to anything else — a mount for a withheld id fails without fetching. The consumer owns the domain contract entirely. Input is opaque JSON, checked structurally so a Date, a function, a cycle, or `undefined` fails at the boundary rather than vanishing somewhere far from the mistake, and checked for nothing else. A contributed renderer receives its own id and that input: no API client, realtime, principal, configuration, database, storage, or credential. Loading one grants its module nothing. The contribution ABI is versioned separately from the module UI ABI, because the two have different shapes and lifecycles and coupling them would force every module to rebuild whenever either moved. It supports asynchronous readiness, update-without-remount (a screen that remounted per tick would restart animations and reload media), deterministic cleanup in a `finally`, and sanitized failure that never carries the consumer's domain data. Each renderer mounts in its own isolated root with its own stylesheet. The template now declares a contribution, so `pnpm build` exercises the whole authoring path, and the shell suite drives the full relationship — one module discovering, mounting, updating, and unmounting another's React renderer with neither importing the other. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-27 07:47:10 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	07835b7b56	feat: give module UI real stylesheets, and every artifact its own root ... ADR 0023 refused stylesheet imports for a good reason: esbuild would emit a `.css` sidecar beside the artifact, nothing would declare it, no host would fetch it, and it would work in a local test and silently do nothing in a real host. Inline style objects were the whole story. They cannot express `:hover`, `:focus-visible`, `:disabled`, `@media`, or `@keyframes` — so an accessible focus treatment was not expressible, and the shared elements added in the previous commit are built from real CSS for exactly that reason. Compile the stylesheet into the artifact instead of beside it. A module imports plain `.css`; the canonical builder resolves local `@import`s through a nested bundle and turns each file into its compiled text, which the author declares as `defineModuleUi({ styles })`. One declared file still contains everything: nothing extra to publish, nothing to fetch, and no way for CSS to become an asset nobody serves. The build additionally fails if a CSS output ever appears beside an artifact, so a future loader change cannot bring the sidecar back. Two rules are enforced with their own codes: a module stylesheet may reference `--ekklesia-*` and never declare one, and every `@import` must resolve locally or the artifact would fetch styles at run time. Plain `.css` only; other dialects are a toolchain decision needing their own ADR. Then make the isolation real. The generic loader mounts every browser artifact — primary, display, and later a contributed renderer — inside an open Shadow DOM root it creates, installs the artifact's stylesheet there, and hands the artifact an element inside it. Shadow DOM is the one mechanism a browser actually enforces; a class prefix or a "scope your selectors" instruction is a convention one mistake defeats, and the failure mode is a module silently restyling the Dashboard. It applies unconditionally, including to artifacts with no stylesheet, because a conditional boundary is one a module can fall out of by editing a source file. Both wrappers are `display: contents` through base rules installed before the artifact's own, so layout is unchanged and a full-viewport display can still override `:host`. Unmount removes the whole root in a `finally`, so a cleanup that throws cannot leave styles behind, and remounting cannot accumulate a second copy. This is a correctness boundary for styles and is not described as a sandbox: the root is `open` precisely because module code is trusted, same-realm code that could reach `document` anyway. An artifact's DOM is no longer a direct child of the host's element, so the mount ABI is versioned explicitly. `defineModuleUi` stamps `MODULE_UI_ABI_VERSION` so it can never drift from the SDK the artifact compiled against, and a version-1 artifact fails with its own code — "rebuild your module", not a typo hunt. No dual acceptance, matching every manifest cutover here. Migration is one `pnpm build`. `pnpm boundaries` allows `.css` only under `src/ui/` and `src/display/`: a stylesheet anywhere else in a module is the undeclared sidecar again, just relocated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-27 07:21:14 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	e03d38fcab	feat: give every Ekklesia screen one set of design tokens and elements ... Modules have owned their own UI since ADR 0021, but the platform has never said what that UI should look like. Every screen here — the Dashboard shell, the display host, the module template — invented its own hex colours, font stack, spacing, and radii, and they already disagreed. A module author had no vocabulary for "the ordinary panel background", so the only available answer was to invent one, and two modules would invent two. Add `@ekklesia/design-tokens`: one validated, enumerable registry of semantic tokens. A token declares a name, label, description, and default value; its category and `--ekklesia-*` identifier are derived from the name, so it can never claim one category while being named for another. Construction rejects duplicates, malformed names, unknown categories, empty or overlong text, and any value that is not a bounded literal — no declaration terminator, rule block, comment, at-rule, `url(`, `!important`, escape, control character, or markup. A registry that constructs can therefore be emitted as CSS without escaping, because nothing needing escaping can be in it. That validation is also what makes a future theme editor implementable rather than aspirational. Add `@ekklesia/ui`: button, icon button, text input, select, checkbox, field wrapper, panel, dialog, tabs, table and list primitives, badge, toast, and empty/error/loading states — every value a token reference, with real `:focus-visible` treatment and status that never depends on colour alone. Deliberately small: an element earns its place when two consumers need it. The stylesheet is a string rather than a `.css` file so the identical bytes install into a document or an isolated artifact root, and so hover, disabled, and focus-visible are real CSS rather than JavaScript approximations of them. `pnpm boundaries` opens exactly two shared roles to modules, by name — every other role stays rejected — and pins both design packages to the bottom of the presentation stack. Both are browser-safe by construction, proven by a real compile of module-shaped source in which `process.env` must fail to typecheck. The shell installs the defaults at its document root for the Dashboard and the display; custom properties inherit into module artifacts, so a module reads `var(--ekklesia-…)` with nothing to import at run time and nothing for a host to forget to pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-27 06:59:44 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	80189c8ae2	feat: give display devices their own paired identity ... ADR 0033 gave Ekklesia a display host and ADR 0034 gave it a login page. Together, the only way to light a television in a foyer was to sign a human being into it and leave that session running on a screen anyone can walk up to: a person's credentials on a wall, a person's session as the thing signage depends on, and the display going dark when they are revoked or their session simply expires. A screen is not a person. Ekklesia now recognizes three principal classes — anonymous, authenticated human, and managed device — and a device is a first-class principal with its own credential and its own explicit permissions. It has no email, no password, and no row in the identity tables, and it satisfies the `authenticated` baseline never, so every route that settles for "somebody is signed in" stays closed to it. Device permissions live in their own table because ekklesia_core_grant.user_id is a non-null foreign key into the user table and making it polymorphic would rewrite the platform's central authorization record to serve one narrow case. That is a schema decision, not a second decision point: the evaluator gained one branch, so a device is allowed or denied by the same function, with the same deny-by-default, as anyone else — with no owner path it could reach and no baseline that stands in for a grant. The six-digit code is not the credential. It is printed across a screen in a public hallway, so it is treated as public: it identifies a request to an administrator and is worth nothing alone. Collecting the credential also requires a 256-bit claim secret held only in the requesting browser's HttpOnly cookie, and approving requires the restricted core.devices.manage permission. Without that split, reading a code off a wall would hand over the screen's identity. The permission a pairing asks for is read from the module's validated display declaration, never from the request, so a browser cannot ask to be granted core.devices.manage or another module's permission. Approval grants exactly that one permission. Credentials are stored only as SHA-256; the raw value exists in the Set-Cookie that issues it and the device's own cookie jar, and is never logged, returned in JSON, or placed in a URL. The cookie is HttpOnly, so the module display code running in that same page cannot read it. Revocation is a server-side column checked on every principal resolution, and re-pairing mints a new identity so an old credential can never come back. State transitions are conditional updates, so one code cannot be approved twice or claimed into two credentials under a race. /api/v1/principal still reports a device as anonymous: it is what the Dashboard uses to decide whether a person is signed in. Displays read their viewer from the descriptor instead, which already performed the authorization — so displays are descriptor-first while the Dashboard stays principal-first, and neither infers an identity by elimination. Proven end to end against real PostgreSQL and real HTTP: an unpaired screen shows a code, an owner approves it, the device opens the display descriptor and a realtime stream, and revocation closes both while the device still holds its cookie. An already-open SSE stream is bounded by realtime's existing five-minute reconnect rather than closed instantly, and that bound is documented rather than called immediate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-23 23:41:03 -05:00
ekklesia	2e0fe059c3	feat: add display kiosk host	2026-08-23 20:50:56 -05:00
ekklesia	fc6c8045c4	feat: add native module realtime transport	2026-08-23 18:47:18 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	44e676f0df	feat: close the browser boundary and add the generic UI host loader ... Two gaps stood between the module UI contract and a host that could use it. ADR 0023 recorded the first honestly but never diagnosed it: a module UI file compiled with `"types": []` could still typecheck `process.env`. The second was simply missing — nothing imported a compiled artifact, checked its identity, mounted it, or tore it down. The leak was one type-only import, bisected against the real type graph rather than guessed. `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk` imported `type { EkklesiaPrincipal } from "@ekklesia/contracts"`. Importing contracts/identity alone is clean and importing Zod alone is clean, but contracts exposes a single barrel entry, so that one import reached module-database, whose Drizzle types re-introduce Node's globals. The runtime was never affected — the import was erased and host-context.js is `export {}` — but a type-graph leak is still a real boundary failure, because it silently permits code that cannot run in its target environment. The fix is not a narrower import path. The SDK now has no dependencies at all, so there is no graph to leak through and no future contracts change can reopen this. It owns `ModuleUiPrincipal`: the same shape ADR 0022 chose, with the Zod brand dropped. That brand encodes a server-side parsing guarantee a browser cannot produce, and it is the same reason `permissions.has` already took a plain string. An Ekklesia host still passes its own `EkklesiaPrincipal` straight through — a branded string is assignable to `string` — while a standalone host builds the literal. Proven the way an author experiences it: two fixtures compiled under the exact project a module uses, one supported and one deliberately reaching for `process`, with the second required to fail on that specific name. `@ekklesia/module-ui-host` is the generic loader, in its own package because the SDK is bundled into every module artifact and host-only loader code has no business shipping there. The boundary checker enforces both directions: modules may not depend on the loader, and the loader may depend only on the SDK plus dev-time tooling. The distinction that shaped the design: Core resolves `entrypoints.ui` to an absolute path on the server's disk, and a browser needs a URL. A loader that accepted the path would test green on a server and fail in every real host, and would quietly own asset publication. So the loader takes a browser-loadable URL and knows nothing about how one is obtained. Ekklesia has no route that publishes installed artifacts, so this is precisely: loader complete, publication deferred. Nothing can mount an installed module UI yet, and the docs say so rather than implying otherwise. Dynamic import is `(url) => import(url)` with a non-analyzable specifier, kept as a runtime import so a host does not statically bundle every installed module or need a hardcoded registry. It is injectable for bundlers needing their own escape hatch, and deliberately not `eval` or `new Function`, which would cost a host `unsafe-eval` in its CSP. Identity is validated through the SDK's existing parser before `mount` runs, so a stale or mismatched bundle never renders. Contract violations propagate unwrapped; the loader adds only import and mount failure codes, sanitized, with the cause attached. Unmount is idempotent, safe when a module returned no cleanup, and marks an instance unmounted before running cleanup so a throwing cleanup surfaces once and never re-runs. A failed mount registers no cleanup. Each instance owns its own state, so two mounts coexist. The loader never mutates the host's container — not on success, failure, or unmount. Tests prove all of it against real module URLs (`data:`, which both browsers and Node import natively) rather than filesystem paths, including one artifact built by the canonical Pass 2 pipeline and run under both an Ekklesia-shaped and a standalone-shaped context. Core, apps/api, and the contracts package are untouched; discovery remains inert. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-21 21:44:42 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	8d651c427d	feat: define the module UI authoring model and host contract ... ADR 0021 established that a module may own UI and added a statically validated, never-executed `entrypoints.ui` path, but deliberately left five questions open: what the artifact exports, what a host provides, how one artifact runs under both Ekklesia and a standalone host, what the browser-side trust model is, and how module UI avoids being welded to a Dashboard that does not exist. This answers them. React and TypeScript are the supported module UI authoring model. The repository already leaned this way: `packages/typescript-config` ships a `browser.json` preset and a `react-native.json` preset with `"jsx": "react-jsx"`, and ADR 0002 names browser and React Native configurations. One framework is supported; every other stays rejected. React is deliberately not part of the contract. A module's compiled artifact default-exports `defineModuleUi({ id, version, mount })`, and `mount(container, context)` takes a DOM element and returns an unmount function. `id` and `version` are build-artifact identity markers a host verifies against the manifest, mirroring `defineModuleRuntime` exactly. A host needs an element and a context, never a matching rendering library, so a module's framework, a host's framework, and the platform boundary between them stay independent. The contract lives in a new `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk` rather than in `@ekklesia/module-sdk`, for a concrete reason: that package re-exports all of `@ekklesia/contracts`, so routing module UI through it would drag Zod, Drizzle, and semver into every browser bundle. The new package has no runtime dependencies, and its one dependency on contracts is type-only — the emitted `host-context.js` is `export {};`, and a test pins that so it cannot regress. The host context is four members: `moduleId`, `api`, `principal`, and `permissions`. Navigation, theme, module configuration, organization context, and diagnostics are deliberately absent; each needs a design that does not exist. Module UI reaches its backend through `api.request(path)` with a path relative to its own API root and never constructs `/api/v1/modules/<id>/...`, which is Ekklesia's private deployment detail — a module that builds that URL is silently unhostable anywhere else. One fixture artifact is mounted under two hosts with different origins and URL shapes to prove it. Client-side permission hints are presentation only, and both the docs and a test say so plainly: a denied hint does not stop the module from calling its API, because server-side `requirePermission` is the only authority. Module UI is trusted code in the host's own browser realm — no iframe, no sandbox — which matches the backend model rather than overstating it, since a module's server half already holds the API's database authority. The boundary guard is narrowed precisely, not removed: `.tsx`, `react`, and `react-dom` are un-denied and modules may depend on the new `module-ui-sdk` role. `.jsx`, `.css`, every other framework, `react-router-dom`, `react-native`, and `@vitejs/plugin-react` stay denied, layer rules are untouched, and an unsupported framework aliased behind an allowed name (`"react": "npm:vue@3"`) is resolved and rejected by its real target. Fixtures prove each case, including that module UI source still cannot import Core. Core, apps/api, and the manifest contract are untouched. Discovery still validates the `entrypoints.ui` path and never evaluates it; hosts perform their own dynamic import and validate the result with `parseModuleUiExport`. No Dashboard shell, UI runtime, navigation, grouping, standalone host, build or styling pipeline, installer, hot-loading, or feature module is added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-21 20:52:47 -05:00