4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5	5abc8be167	chore(release): prepare 0.1.2 ... Every workspace package declares 0.1.2, as the 0.1.1 release did for itself, and the deploy README's build example names it. The tag v0.1.2 created on 12dca3e carries package.json 0.1.1, which the instance's assemble.sh refuses ("its tag and package.json disagree"), and the running platform would report 0.1.1. 0.1.2 carries what the first production deployment found: - #57: Doctor checks the client-address configuration the API runs; - #58: storage over HTTP/1.1 (repeat image loads no longer fail with ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR), and storage CORS owned by the proxy; - #60: CI stacks never outlive their job; - #56: display-device smoke scenarios; - #59, #61: ADR 0047 proposed, and the CI documentation corrected for Gitea 1.27.2. templates/module keeps its own version. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-05 22:56:35 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5	7cbe4e1b2c	chore(release): prepare 0.1.1 and accept ADR 0044 ... Bump the root and every platform workspace package from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1, so the platform reports the version the v0.1.1 tag will carry. Module discovery checks compatibility.platform against the root version and compatibility.moduleSdk against @ekklesia/module-sdk; both stay inside every existing ^0.1.0 range, so no module needs a new range. Everything since v0.1.0 is additive (health endpoints, Dashboard serving, production dependency declarations, the deployment image and Compose project). templates/module keeps 0.1.0: it is a module, versioned on its own, and its manifest, source, and tests carry its own product version. Mark ADR 0044 Accepted. Slices 1-4 are implemented and proven by CI's image build and deploy smoke; slice 6 (scheduled backups and the restore procedure) remains its open item. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-03 10:03:33 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	1e5866504e	feat: build module UI into its declared browser artifact ... ADR 0022 defined what a module UI is and selected React and TypeScript as the authoring model, but closed by recording that it was not buildable end to end: `browser.json` preserves JSX, bundler plugins are denied, and nothing turned a module's `.tsx` into the artifact its manifest declares. This closes exactly that gap. esbuild produces the artifact. It was already the right answer before it was chosen: this workspace resolves esbuild 0.28.1 through Vite/Vitest today and `pnpm-workspace.yaml` already carries `allowBuilds: esbuild`, so the pinned dependency adds no second copy and no new trust decision. It is also the smallest tool that covers TSX, ESM, browser platform, bundling, source maps, and a define-time constant with no plugin ecosystem. Vite library mode would drag in `@vitejs/plugin-react`, which the module boundary denies on purpose; `tsc` alone cannot bundle, so its output would carry bare `react/jsx-runtime` imports no browser resolves. React is bundled, not externalized. That follows from ADR 0022 rather than from convenience: `mount()` was made the ABI precisely so React would not be part of the host contract, and externalizing it would reverse that through the build system — every host would have to supply a compatible React, and a standalone host might not use React at all. The cost is real and accepted: duplicate runtimes and a ~570 KB unminified artifact. Sharing one runtime later is a build optimization that cannot change the contract, because the contract is a mount function. Output is browser ESM at `es2022`, unminified so an operator can review what they install, with `process.env.NODE_ENV` substituted — React reads it at module scope and would otherwise touch a Node global that does not exist in a browser. The output path is read from the module's own manifest rather than a build convention, so declared and produced artifacts cannot drift, and it is validated with the same `packageRelativePathSchema` discovery enforces, so a build can never write where discovery would later reject. `@ekklesia/module-ui-build` owns every option; modules own none. It uses the existing `tooling` role that modules could already depend on, so this pass required no boundary relaxation at all. Its `bin` points at a committed launcher rather than compiled output because pnpm links bins during install, before Turborepo builds anything — a bin targeting `dist/cli.js` fails to link on a fresh clone and breaks every module's UI build in CI. A module with no `entrypoints.ui` is not an error; the CLI reports nothing to build and exits zero, so one script serves both kinds of module. Styling is React inline style objects. A stylesheet import fails the build rather than emitting a sidecar `.css` that no manifest declares and no host loads — an undeclared asset would appear to work in tests and silently do nothing in a real host. `templates/module` is the canonical example and now ships optional UI. Its tests build the artifact from source, validate it with `parseModuleUiExport`, mount it into a real DOM, assert the rendered output, and unmount it; the artifact is rebuilt per run so the proof can never pass against stale output, and `dist/` stays gitignored. Because verify runs both `pnpm test` and `pnpm build`, a UI that cannot be produced fails CI through two independent paths. One correction worth stating plainly: the UI TypeScript project declares `"types": []`, and a UI file referencing `process` does fail in isolation, but TypeScript still pulls Node globals in transitively — a file importing `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk` reaches `@ekklesia/contracts` and through its Zod and Drizzle types `process.env` typechecks again. The docs and ADR describe this as the convention it is rather than the guard it is not. Core is untouched. Building is an authoring step; discovery still only validates the artifact a module shipped and never executes or produces one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-21 21:24:18 -05:00
ekklesia	192a6514cf	chore: establish Ekklesia platform foundation	2026-07-12 20:28:19 -05:00