490b85b07c8e41f28afe3e00937f2e8d25c5f8c9
10
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
532ce3803b |
fix: preserve authorization security history
Two security records did not survive user deletion, because both hung off a cascading foreign key to the live Better Auth user row. Deleting a user with authorization history deleted that history. A subject with a create and a revoke audit row had zero rows afterwards: the record of what they had been granted, by whom, and when it was revoked disappeared at exactly the moment it mattered most. `ekklesia_core_authorization_audit.subject_user_id` is now a retained, non-null historical snapshot with no foreign key — a plain identifier that may name a user row which no longer exists. No name, email, or other profile data is copied into authorization tables. The Drizzle relation to the user table is dropped too, because modelling a retained snapshot as a live relation misdescribes the data. Live rows still cascade, as intended: deleting a user removes their grants and platform-owner row, so nothing continues authorizing a principal that no longer exists. Platform-owner bootstrap's single use was equally fragile. "Already consumed" meant "a row exists in ekklesia_core_platform_owner", and that table cascades too — so deleting the bootstrapped owner's user row removed the owner row, its audit evidence, and with them the only thing preventing the operation that establishes a platform's first administrator from being run again. A dedicated `ekklesia_core_platform_owner_bootstrap` singleton now carries that authority. Its id is pinned by a check constraint to the literal 'singleton', so the primary key makes a second row structurally impossible rather than merely unwritten by convention; it has no user foreign key, and Core never deletes from it. Bootstrap claims that record inside the same transaction as the owner row and its audit entry, so consumption is tied to success: a missing target user or any other failure rolls the sentinel back and leaves the one legitimate first use available. The existing transaction-scoped advisory lock still serializes concurrent first attempts to exactly one success. The operational consequence is deliberate and permanent: deleting the last platform owner does not reactivate bootstrap, and neither does revoking one. Core migration 0002_authorization_integrity creates the singleton table, drops the cascading audit-subject constraint, and backfills consumed state for any installation that already holds a platform-owner row — active or revoked — so an existing deployment cannot gain a fresh first use by upgrading. It records no subject, because a backfill cannot know which of several historical owner rows the original use targeted and guessing would fabricate history. A never-owned installation is untouched and keeps its one first use. One upgrade limitation is irrecoverable and is documented rather than papered over: if an operator manually deleted the bootstrapped owner's user row before this migration, the old cascade already erased the owner row and its audit evidence, so nothing remains to detect. At this checkpoint no supported Better Auth or API user-deletion path can produce that state; it requires direct database access. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
6b6b77c105 |
fix: enforce production transport policy
Every PostgreSQL connection this repository opened was plaintext, in every environment: no connection site set `ssl` at all, so credentials, session tokens, and row data crossed the network in the clear and nothing in configuration, startup, or `pnpm doctor` said so. The public identity URL boundary was also looser than it appeared. `core/src/database/transport.ts` is now the one typed policy. It has exactly two modes: `verify-full` (TLS required, certificate chain verified, and server identity verified against the configured host — the production default) and `disable` (the development/test default, refused outright in production). There is deliberately no encryption-only `require` mode, no chain-only `verify-ca`, and no `rejectUnauthorized: false` escape hatch anywhere in the configuration surface; every loose or aliased spelling is rejected in both environments, so a typo never quietly becomes a weaker mode. Production has no plaintext exception at all, not even for a loopback database — a connection string cannot prove the database is process-local. Verification is certificate *and* hostname. The policy supplies an explicit `checkServerIdentity` pinned to the host parsed from DATABASE_URL, because the pinned driver sets TLS `servername` only for non-IP hosts and Node performs no identity check when it is unset — so `rejectUnauthorized: true` alone accepts a certificate from any host the trusted CA ever signed when connecting by IP. Both halves are proven against a real TLS-enabled PostgreSQL, including that the same connection without the pinned callback succeeds. Every CA, certificate, and key is generated at test runtime and deleted afterwards. A DATABASE_URL may no longer carry its own TLS parameters. The pinned driver merges parsed connection-string values over explicitly passed options, so a `?sslmode=disable` in the URL would silently replace the policy's verified `ssl` object; that now fails with a stable code, reported by both `pnpm doctor` and the migration CLIs rather than as "failed unexpectedly". One shared environment reader keeps `process.env` out of Core's reusable constructors, and every executable that opens a connection resolves the policy identically: the API (validated before any pool, Better Auth instance, module runtime, or listener exists), both migration commands, the bootstrap CLI, and Doctor's own connection. Doctor reports it as a blocking failure, never a warning, naming only the effective mode. Separately, the identity base URL and every trusted origin must now be exactly one canonical origin — the WHATWG origin serialization must equal the supplied string — so a path, trailing slash, credentials, explicit default port, or non-canonical case is rejected rather than normalized into something that no longer matches what a browser sends. Production's loopback rejection now classifies the address instead of comparing against three literals, covering `.localhost`, all of 127.0.0.0/8, 0.0.0.0, `::`, expanded and IPv4-mapped forms. This is a configuration-shape guarantee only: it does not resolve DNS or prove reachability, and TLS protects the connection, not the exposure. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesia
|
c38b572778 |
docs: document module database access
Add ADR 0016 recording the accepted module database access design (ModuleDatabase, the frozen ModuleRuntimeServices boundary, one pool/one facade/one services-object identity, explicit migrations, and the trust model), with narrow cross-reference corrections to ADR 0006 and ADR 0015 where their original text is now inaccurate. Sweep docs/development/api.md, docs/development/authorization.md, docs/module-development/README.md, docs/development/testing.md, and docs/development/identity.md for the new database boundary and remaining Phase 4C staleness; correct the stale "Phase 4C is next" roadmap paragraph in platform-architecture.md and the matching gap in README's current-status narrative. Extend the module template with a permissioned GET /records route reading through context.services.database, using the canonical createModuleTable helper, with matching template tests. |
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Sonnet 5
|
dfaf324a65 |
feat: mount module HTTP routes
Phase 5B, pass 2: production API mounting, authorization enforcement, and module-runtime lifecycle integration. apps/api now discovers the installed module inventory exactly once (prepareStartupModuleInventory), composes the platform permission registry from it, starts the module runtime from that same discovered list (startDiscoveredModuleRuntime, never rediscovering), and mounts StartedModuleRuntime's published routes under /api/v1/modules/<module-id> via a new apps/api-owned Hono adapter (module-http-routes.ts). Every module route is protected by the existing requirePermission middleware against the composed registry, state-changing methods additionally require a trusted Origin, OPTIONS remains entirely platform-owned, and a handler that throws, rejects, or returns a non-Response becomes a fixed, sanitized 500 MODULE_HANDLER_FAILED. Module-supplied CORS headers are stripped and every module response is forced to Cache-Control: no-store with Vary: Origin, Cookie. RunningApi shutdown now stops the module runtime between draining the HTTP server and closing the shared pool, and every startup failure path stops the runtime and/or closes the pool before propagating, without masking the original failure. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesia
|
9fa051be61 |
docs: record module authorization architecture
Adds ADR 0014 recording the durable architecture Phase 5A established across both passes: the shared contracts-layer PermissionDeclaration, manifest version 3 replacing version 2's bare permission strings, the reserved core.* namespace and the structural guarantee that a module-vs-Core collision always surfaces as ModulePermissionCompositionError rather than the generic PermissionRegistryError duplicate path, deterministic registry composition, startup ordering, repository-root/package-version resolution, registry injection into apps/api's enforcement and explicit-grant HTTP API, the static-snapshot/historical-record preservation guarantees, and Doctor/modules:validate integration. Indexes it in the ADR README, cross-references it from ADR 0006 (only its manifestVersion 2 / permission-string decision is superseded; the rest of ADR 0006 remains accepted, and its historical text is left untouched) and ADR 0013 (module permission registration, deferred there, is what ADR 0014 implements), and links it from the relevant development documentation. Corrects two comments discovered during a direct source audit that overstated where a module-vs-Core permission collision is actually caught (core/src/modules/permissions.ts, apps/api/src/platform-permissions.ts) — comment-only, no behavior change, already covered by existing tests. Also corrects a documentation claim in docs/development/authorization.md that incorrectly implied removing a module blocks explicit revocation of its historical grants; grants-routes.ts's revoke handler never consults the permission registry, so revocation remains unaffected. |
||
|
ekklesia
|
edd7148aa8 |
feat: integrate module authorization
Wires composePlatformPermissionRegistry into apps/api's production startup: startApi() discovers every installed module, composes the one immutable platform permission registry (Core's own declarations plus every module's), and only then constructs the shared PostgreSQL pool, Better Auth, and the HTTP server. A discovery or composition failure — an invalid manifest, a reserved core.* namespace claim, or a duplicate declaration — propagates before anything exists to close; there is no Core-only registry fallback. apps/api/src/platform-permissions.ts resolves the repository root from its own file location, never process.cwd(), so package-scoped test runs discover the right modules/ directory. createApiApp/createGrantsRoutes now require the composed registry as an injected authorization option, replacing the previous hard-coded CORE_PERMISSION_REGISTRY; requirePermission continues to work identically for Core-owned and module-owned permissions, since it has no concept of the distinction. Extends pnpm doctor with a modules.permissions check (reusing the already-discovered module list, distinguishing reserved-namespace from generic-duplicate failures, never re-discovering modules) and pnpm modules:validate to compose the same registry before a module is considered installable. Adds focused coverage: startup-ordering and failure-isolation tests in apps/api/tests/lifecycle.test.ts, module-owned-declaration enforcement tests in apps/api/tests/authorization-middleware.test.ts, Doctor composition tests in core/tests/doctor.test.ts, and a live PostgreSQL end-to-end scenario proving a real installed module's permission is discoverable, grantable, and deniable once the module is absent again after a restart, without ever executing its server entrypoint. |
||
|
ekklesia
|
d9dd409aa3 |
feat: declare module permissions
Establishes the one canonical PermissionDeclaration contract (packages/contracts/src/authorization.ts) — id/baseline/description, strict, unknown-property-rejecting — consumed by both Core's authorization registry and module manifests, replacing Core's previously separate interface. Bumps the canonical module manifest to manifestVersion 3: permissions become complete declarations instead of bare identifier strings, with manifest-owned namespace and duplicate-id enforcement. Version 2 and bare string-array permissions are rejected outright; there is no compatibility adapter. Adds composePlatformPermissionRegistry (core/src/modules/permissions.ts), a pure, synchronous composer that builds one platform permission registry from Core's own declarations plus every already-discovered module's, in deterministic order, reusing createPermissionRegistry and rejecting any module-contributed permission in the reserved core.* namespace. core/src/authorization remains independent of core/src/modules; only the module integration layer depends on authorization. Updates the module template, module-development docs, authorization docs, and existing manifest fixtures for manifestVersion 3. Does not wire the combined registry into apps/api — that is pass 2. |
||
|
ekklesia
|
df2af0a3e0 |
fix: enforce registered authorization permissions
Two related fail-closed gaps let a well-formed but never-declared permission id slip through: - POST /api/v1/grants created explicit grants for any well-formed PermissionId without checking the injected permission registry, allowing dormant grants for invented identifiers that could become effective the moment those identifiers were registered later. - createAuthorizationEvaluator validated the permission id only inside the restricted-baseline branch, so a malformed permission combined with the public or authenticated baseline could still return allowed. Both now fail closed: the grants route checks the target permission against the trusted registry before calling store.createGrant (sanitized 403, no store or audit write), and the evaluator validates permission shape before any baseline is allowed to return an allowed decision, without adding a registry dependency to the evaluator itself. The live integration lifecycle test switched from an unregistered calendar.events.read to the registered core.authorization.grants.manage permission, since module permission registration does not exist yet. |
||
|
ekklesia
|
967c275027 |
docs: record core authorization architecture
Adds ADR 0013 documenting the durable Phase 4C decisions (permission registry, evaluator baselines, grant/scope semantics, platform-owner bootstrap, shared database pool, Origin enforcement, and what remains deferred), cross-links it from the authorization/README docs, and refreshes the pnpm doctor no-DATABASE_URL example output in README.md and repository-workflow.md to include the authorization migration. |
||
|
ekklesia
|
1363608552 |
feat: add authorization bootstrap and HTTP enforcement
Wires Core's identity and authorization domains into apps/api over one shared, validated PostgreSQL pool; adds an explicit, single-use, concurrency-safe platform-owner bootstrap CLI; adds a smallest-possible immutable permission registry with one Core-owned restricted permission (core.authorization.grants.manage); and adds reusable Hono authorization enforcement plus a narrowly scoped /api/v1/grants HTTP API for managing explicit grants only, gated by an exact trusted Origin on every mutation. |