Commit Graph
9 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5 e36b70d8d4 feat: one generic image, with installed modules in installation-owned storage (ADR 0048)
CI / verify (pull_request) Failing after 47s
CI / infrastructure-smoke (pull_request) Skipped
CI / migration-smoke (pull_request) Skipped
CI / image-build (pull_request) Skipped
CI / deploy-smoke (same-origin) (pull_request) Skipped
CI / deploy-smoke (split) (pull_request) Skipped
The production image now contains zero feature modules and is the same for every
installation. Installed modules live in module storage that one Core resolver
selects from EKKLESIA_MODULES_DIR: the checkout's modules/ when unset, an
absolute path that must exist when set (/var/lib/ekklesia/modules in the image).
A relative, blank, missing, or unreadable configured directory fails closed with
a sanitized error that never contains the value.

- Host configuration reads EKKLESIA_MODULES_DIR. The API, migration plan, apply
  and validate, module validation, module enablement, and Doctor all resolve it
  the same way; the test-only API override still takes precedence.
- Doctor receives Core's migrations directory explicitly instead of deriving it
  from the modules directory's parent.
- The migration runner retains and reports the applied history of a module that
  is not installed, and plans and applies Core's and present modules' migrations
  around it. Core's history and every installed module's history stay strict: a
  missing or changed applied migration, or a downgrade, still fails. No down
  migrations, no data deletion.
- deploy/Dockerfile copies no module and installs nothing for the module
  template; .dockerignore excludes modules/ and the build refuses a context that
  contains it; the runtime has an empty root-owned /var/lib/ekklesia/modules and
  sets EKKLESIA_MODULES_DIR.
- deploy/compose.yaml bind-mounts EKKLESIA_MODULES_HOST_DIR read-only into api
  and migrate, with create_host_path disabled.
- scripts/check-image.sh proves the image holds no modules and that a populated
  modules/ directory leaves its runtime file system identical; CI runs it.
- The split deploy smoke now uses the same generic image: it boots with no
  modules, installs a self-contained test module packaged from the template
  (test-only), migrates and restarts, removes it (Core runs, planning reports the
  retained history, data survives), and restores it with its data.

Docs: deploy README (module storage, install/update/remove/restore, the runtime
modules target), .env.example, API configuration, module development guide,
testing, workflow, security, and the architecture overview.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
2026-10-07 08:38:14 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5 c444ff570b feat: let one module contribute a browser renderer to another's capability
The platform has had a complete story for one module using another's
*backend* since ADR 0006 — capabilities, versioned ranges, provider
registration. It has had none at all for one module using another's *browser*
code, and every workaround is wrong in a way that matters: a consumer cannot
import a peer module, it cannot re-implement a renderer for a domain it does
not own, and a second `entrypoints` role would put the platform in charge of
deciding when a slot inside someone else's screen should be filled.

Add a generic browser contribution. `manifestVersion: 7` declares one:
namespaced id, its own version, a target capability, a compatible range, and
one artifact. That is the complete list, and the omissions are the decision —
no payload schema, slot, ordering, or rendering hint exists anywhere, so Core
cannot learn what a slide is because the declaration cannot express it.

Discovery resolves a contribution artifact through the *identical* loop every
other compiled entrypoint uses, inheriting the path, containment, symlink,
extension, and file-kind checks rather than getting a weaker copy of them. The
registry publishes one only when another eligible module provides the target
capability within the declared range; otherwise it is absent rather than
mounted and broken. `apps/api` serves it as a sibling of the artifact and
display routes, with the same policy: three lookup keys, one exact match, one
already-validated path, and one indistinguishable 404 for unknown, undeclared,
stale, and incompatible alike.

A consumer discovers through the host, never through a URL. Its descriptor
carries identity, version, and capability; the URL stays server-side and is
resolved exactly as `api.request("records")` is. A module can only ever see
contributions aimed at a capability it itself provides, and cannot name its
way to anything else — a mount for a withheld id fails without fetching.

The consumer owns the domain contract entirely. Input is opaque JSON, checked
structurally so a Date, a function, a cycle, or `undefined` fails at the
boundary rather than vanishing somewhere far from the mistake, and checked for
nothing else. A contributed renderer receives its own id and that input: no
API client, realtime, principal, configuration, database, storage, or
credential. Loading one grants its module nothing.

The contribution ABI is versioned separately from the module UI ABI, because
the two have different shapes and lifecycles and coupling them would force
every module to rebuild whenever either moved. It supports asynchronous
readiness, update-without-remount (a screen that remounted per tick would
restart animations and reload media), deterministic cleanup in a `finally`,
and sanitized failure that never carries the consumer's domain data. Each
renderer mounts in its own isolated root with its own stylesheet.

The template now declares a contribution, so `pnpm build` exercises the whole
authoring path, and the shell suite drives the full relationship — one module
discovering, mounting, updating, and unmounting another's React renderer with
neither importing the other.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
2026-08-27 07:47:10 -05:00
ekklesia 2e0fe059c3 feat: add display kiosk host
CI / verify (pull_request) Successful in 38s
CI / infrastructure-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 20s
CI / migration-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 59s
2026-08-23 20:50:56 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5 3f9b5e3cb0 fix: require a compiled artifact for entrypoints.jobs
CI / verify (pull_request) Successful in 31s
CI / infrastructure-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 21s
CI / migration-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 42s
Module discovery gated the compiled-ESM rule on an allowlist,
`["schema", "server", "ui"]`, so `entrypoints.jobs` accepted
`./src/jobs/index.ts`. Every other executable entrypoint required a built
`.js` or `.mjs`; `jobs` did not, purely because it was never added to
that list. It is the second entrypoint to slip through the same way —
`ui` did too, until Phase 6A added it explicitly — which is the argument
against the allowlist rather than against `jobs`.

The rule is now expressed as "every entrypoint except a directory
entrypoint", with `migrations` the only member of that set. A new
manifest entrypoint therefore defaults to the stricter validation instead
of silently escaping it. The same constant replaces the two existing
`=== "migrations"` special cases for the file/directory kind check and
its message, so the one thing that distinguishes `migrations` is stated
once. The directory message is now templated and produces byte-identical
text.

Every other entrypoint guarantee is untouched: package-relative paths,
no traversal, inside-package before and after symlink resolution, the
artifact must exist, and it must be a file.

No runtime was added. `entrypoints.jobs` still has no consumer — it is
declared, validated, and never executed — exactly as it has been since
ADR 0006, and as `ui` was before its host loader existed. The manifest
schema is unchanged and this stays within v4: the field, its type, and
its optionality are all the same, and only discovery's validation of the
declared path tightened.

Compatibility impact is nil in first-party code: no module, template, or
fixture declares a `jobs` entrypoint at all. A third-party module
declaring a source-TypeScript path would now fail discovery, which is the
intended correction.

Tests cover accepted `.js` and `.mjs`, rejected `.ts`/`.tsx`/`.cjs`, a
missing artifact, a directory, a symlink escaping the package, and that
discovery still never evaluates the artifact. The three rejection cases
were confirmed to fail against the previous implementation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
2026-08-21 22:07:54 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5 44ba259f58 feat: establish the module product contract
CI / verify (pull_request) Successful in 2m31s
CI / infrastructure-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / migration-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 49s
Ekklesia's module model has been backend-only since ADR 0001: a module
owns domain behavior and data, and every presentation concern belongs to
a surface. That prevents a module author — the person who knows the
domain — from shipping the screen that makes their module useful, and it
guarantees a module and its own UI drift apart. It also pushes toward two
codebases for one domain the moment a module needs to run standalone.

ADR 0021 replaces that rule. A module is an independently versioned
product that owns its domain behavior, data, permissions, routes,
migrations, and its own UI, hostable inside Ekklesia and — from the same
implementation — by a later standalone host. Core keeps the containing
application shell and every platform policy: authentication,
authorization enforcement, platform context, top-level routing,
navigation, global theme, error boundaries, and trusted-origin/CORS. The
module graph stays flat: modules are peers, genuine module and capability
dependencies remain the only relationships, and Dashboard folders are
presentation configuration an administrator can reorganize, never module
architecture.

This pass implements the static contract only. `manifestVersion` moves to
4 and `entrypoints` gains one optional field, `ui`. Version 3's
`entrypoints` is strict and rejects `ui`, so this is an incompatible
shape change and version 3 is now rejected outright rather than
reinterpreted, exactly as version 1 was by version 2 and version 2 by
version 3. Every field version 4 adds is optional, so upgrading a
backend-only manifest is a one-character edit.

Discovery resolves and validates `ui` under the same rules as `server`
and `schema` — package-relative, inside the package before and after
symlink resolution, a real file, compiled ESM `.js`/`.mjs`, so source
TypeScript is rejected rather than assumed to be compiled later.
Discovery stays inert: nothing imports, evaluates, mounts, or renders a
UI entrypoint, and a test proves a throwing artifact still discovers
successfully. This follows `entrypoints.jobs`, declared and resolved
since ADR 0006 with no runtime consumer.

The name is `ui`, not `dashboard`, because a module's UI must be hostable
by Ekklesia's shell and by a standalone host, so the contract cannot be
named after one of them; and not `surface`, because `surfaces/*` is a
separate ownership layer. No widget, route, icon, folder, menu, layout,
or standalone-metadata field is added, and tests assert the manifest
still rejects every unknown entrypoint key and offers no hierarchy field.

Deliberately unchanged: `scripts/check-boundaries.ts` still enforces
`modules-do-not-own-ui`. Relaxing that guard depends entirely on the UI
authoring model a later pass chooses, and weakening a working protection
before that decision exists would trade real coverage for nothing. A
module may therefore declare `ui` today only for a framework-neutral
compiled artifact, and the docs say so rather than implying otherwise.
Restart-based discovery, explicit operator-invoked migrations, and the
trusted compiled-module model are untouched — a module that ships UI is
exactly as trusted as one that does not.

No Dashboard shell, UI runtime, renderer, framework choice, navigation
registry, grouping system, standalone host, installer, hot-loading, or
feature module is added by this pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
2026-08-21 20:20:41 -05:00
ekklesia d9dd409aa3 feat: declare module permissions
Establishes the one canonical PermissionDeclaration contract
(packages/contracts/src/authorization.ts) — id/baseline/description,
strict, unknown-property-rejecting — consumed by both Core's
authorization registry and module manifests, replacing Core's
previously separate interface.

Bumps the canonical module manifest to manifestVersion 3: permissions
become complete declarations instead of bare identifier strings, with
manifest-owned namespace and duplicate-id enforcement. Version 2 and
bare string-array permissions are rejected outright; there is no
compatibility adapter.

Adds composePlatformPermissionRegistry (core/src/modules/permissions.ts),
a pure, synchronous composer that builds one platform permission
registry from Core's own declarations plus every already-discovered
module's, in deterministic order, reusing createPermissionRegistry
and rejecting any module-contributed permission in the reserved
core.* namespace. core/src/authorization remains independent of
core/src/modules; only the module integration layer depends on
authorization.

Updates the module template, module-development docs, authorization
docs, and existing manifest fixtures for manifestVersion 3. Does not
wire the combined registry into apps/api — that is pass 2.
2026-07-24 12:25:00 -05:00
ekklesia 80b56b72b1 feat: add module schema discovery and validation
CI / verify (pull_request) Successful in 24s
CI / infrastructure-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 20s
2026-07-13 21:35:21 -05:00
ekklesia 7b448d8706 feat: add module runtime lifecycle
CI / verify (push) Successful in 2m14s
CI / infrastructure-smoke (push) Failing after 1m36s
2026-07-12 22:49:51 -05:00
ekklesia 57552a21a4 feat: add module contracts and discovery
CI / verify (push) Has been cancelled
CI / infrastructure-smoke (push) Has been cancelled
2026-07-12 22:14:01 -05:00