a12cbe9600b2020407da5f58ac2f15379a70aca4
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
c444ff570b |
feat: let one module contribute a browser renderer to another's capability
The platform has had a complete story for one module using another's
*backend* since ADR 0006 — capabilities, versioned ranges, provider
registration. It has had none at all for one module using another's *browser*
code, and every workaround is wrong in a way that matters: a consumer cannot
import a peer module, it cannot re-implement a renderer for a domain it does
not own, and a second `entrypoints` role would put the platform in charge of
deciding when a slot inside someone else's screen should be filled.
Add a generic browser contribution. `manifestVersion: 7` declares one:
namespaced id, its own version, a target capability, a compatible range, and
one artifact. That is the complete list, and the omissions are the decision —
no payload schema, slot, ordering, or rendering hint exists anywhere, so Core
cannot learn what a slide is because the declaration cannot express it.
Discovery resolves a contribution artifact through the *identical* loop every
other compiled entrypoint uses, inheriting the path, containment, symlink,
extension, and file-kind checks rather than getting a weaker copy of them. The
registry publishes one only when another eligible module provides the target
capability within the declared range; otherwise it is absent rather than
mounted and broken. `apps/api` serves it as a sibling of the artifact and
display routes, with the same policy: three lookup keys, one exact match, one
already-validated path, and one indistinguishable 404 for unknown, undeclared,
stale, and incompatible alike.
A consumer discovers through the host, never through a URL. Its descriptor
carries identity, version, and capability; the URL stays server-side and is
resolved exactly as `api.request("records")` is. A module can only ever see
contributions aimed at a capability it itself provides, and cannot name its
way to anything else — a mount for a withheld id fails without fetching.
The consumer owns the domain contract entirely. Input is opaque JSON, checked
structurally so a Date, a function, a cycle, or `undefined` fails at the
boundary rather than vanishing somewhere far from the mistake, and checked for
nothing else. A contributed renderer receives its own id and that input: no
API client, realtime, principal, configuration, database, storage, or
credential. Loading one grants its module nothing.
The contribution ABI is versioned separately from the module UI ABI, because
the two have different shapes and lifecycles and coupling them would force
every module to rebuild whenever either moved. It supports asynchronous
readiness, update-without-remount (a screen that remounted per tick would
restart animations and reload media), deterministic cleanup in a `finally`,
and sanitized failure that never carries the consumer's domain data. Each
renderer mounts in its own isolated root with its own stylesheet.
The template now declares a contribution, so `pnpm build` exercises the whole
authoring path, and the shell suite drives the full relationship — one module
discovering, mounting, updating, and unmounting another's React renderer with
neither importing the other.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
|
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
3563549e86 |
fix: let a deployment name itself in the SMTP greeting
A real deployment could not send mail through an IP-authorized relay. Every attempt surfaced as MAIL_PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE while the relay was healthy and swaks sent from the same machine. The cause was the greeting, and it is generic rather than tied to any provider. An SMTP client identifies itself in EHLO, and with nothing configured Nodemailer derives that from the machine hostname — substituting the address literal [127.0.0.1] whenever the hostname is not fully qualified, which is the normal state of a container. The relay closed the connection on it with a 421 before any message was offered, which is indistinguishable from the relay being down. EKKLESIA_SMTP_HELO_NAME now lets the deployment say what to greet as. It is validated as a fully qualified domain name — no scheme, port, brackets, whitespace, or control characters, and at least one dot, since a single unqualified label is exactly the input Nodemailer already discards. It is not a credential: it travels in the clear on every connection, so Doctor prints it where an operator can compare it against what the relay expects, and Doctor's probe performs the same greeting the runtime does. Absent preserves Nodemailer's behaviour exactly. It is deliberately not defaulted to the sender's domain: a machine whose hostname is already a valid FQDN may be greeting correctly, and some relays check that against reverse DNS, so replacing it silently would trade one deployment's bug for another's. The regression guard is a raw SMTP server that refuses any greeting but the expected one, because smtp-server exposes no EHLO hook and its earliest hook is never reached by a send-nothing probe. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
2b4f0afb72 |
fix: give Doctor the host configuration the runtime receives
`pnpm doctor` and `startApi` each read their own subset of the same environment variables, and the subsets had drifted. Doctor never read `S3_*` or module secrets at all, so a correctly configured installation was told its object storage was "not configured" and every module requiring a bucket or a secret was reported blocked -- while the runtime, from the identical environment, bound those buckets and ran the modules. Both executables now map the environment through one `loadHostConfiguration(env)` in Core, which takes the environment as an argument and never reads `process.env` itself. Validation stays with the existing per-domain validators, so each caller keeps its own failure behaviour: startup refuses a rejected value, Doctor reports it as a sanitized code. Doctor's storage option becomes raw input like its mail option, so a half-configured provider is reported as a blocking configuration failure instead of throwing before a report exists. The outbound-email check -- computed, counted toward the result, but absent from every rendered section -- is now printed, and the rendered set is asserted against a real report so a future check cannot go missing the same way. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |