ac5b2b7f6caf3f0fb9200007f48908ce06614ce6
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
616c1d4834 |
feat: mount discovered module UI in a minimal Ekklesia browser host
Phase 6C pass 2. Every link in the module UI chain existed except the one that closes it: a module could be authored, built, validated, published at a browser URL, and loaded by a generic loader — and nothing in Ekklesia did any of it. There was no browser application at all. Two pieces were missing. A browser could not discover what to mount, and it must not work that out for itself. GET /api/v1/module-ui is the inventory: per publishable module, its id and version, the server-produced artifact URL, the server-produced root of the module's own API, and the subset of that module's declared permissions the caller holds. Five fields, each because building a ModuleUiHostContext needs it — no filesystem paths, and no name/icon/folder/order, because navigation metadata is a design that does not exist yet. Its module set is the ADR 0025 publication registry rather than a rescan, so the inventory and the artifact route cannot disagree. It requires a new Core permission, core.modules.ui.read (baseline authenticated), because it is precisely the enumeration the anonymous artifact route deliberately withholds. Both URLs are server-produced. moduleUiArtifactUrl already existed; moduleApiBaseUrl is now exported and moduleRoutePath builds on it, so each URL shape has exactly one author. Without it the shell would hardcode /api/v1/modules/<id> — the prefix ADR 0022 forbids a module UI from spelling, reappearing in the host instead. surfaces/shell (@ekklesia/shell) is the repository's first surface: a small React application built to static files by its own esbuild script. It resolves the principal, fetches the inventory, builds the host context entirely from server-derived data, and hands the artifact URL to @ekklesia/module-ui-host. One frame per selection — keyed by module identity — defeats the stale-load race; the host owns the container, the loading state, and every failure, so a broken module costs its own panel rather than the shell. The shell statically imports no module, and both levels are checked: no source import may name a module, and the emitted bundle must contain exactly one dynamic import (the loader's) with no module id, no /api/v1/modules, no eval, and no blob URL. Permission hints come from Core's own evaluator and stay presentation-only — the end-to-end test has a UI holding no grant call its API anyway and still receive 403. Surfaces may now depend only on browser-safe shared roles; @ekklesia/contracts is deliberately excluded, since its barrel pulls Drizzle's types and Node's globals into the browser — the hole ADR 0024 closed one layer down. Not the Dashboard: no navigation, grouping, icons, ordering, design system, or routing. The selector is a list of module ids. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
44ba259f58 |
feat: establish the module product contract
Ekklesia's module model has been backend-only since ADR 0001: a module owns domain behavior and data, and every presentation concern belongs to a surface. That prevents a module author — the person who knows the domain — from shipping the screen that makes their module useful, and it guarantees a module and its own UI drift apart. It also pushes toward two codebases for one domain the moment a module needs to run standalone. ADR 0021 replaces that rule. A module is an independently versioned product that owns its domain behavior, data, permissions, routes, migrations, and its own UI, hostable inside Ekklesia and — from the same implementation — by a later standalone host. Core keeps the containing application shell and every platform policy: authentication, authorization enforcement, platform context, top-level routing, navigation, global theme, error boundaries, and trusted-origin/CORS. The module graph stays flat: modules are peers, genuine module and capability dependencies remain the only relationships, and Dashboard folders are presentation configuration an administrator can reorganize, never module architecture. This pass implements the static contract only. `manifestVersion` moves to 4 and `entrypoints` gains one optional field, `ui`. Version 3's `entrypoints` is strict and rejects `ui`, so this is an incompatible shape change and version 3 is now rejected outright rather than reinterpreted, exactly as version 1 was by version 2 and version 2 by version 3. Every field version 4 adds is optional, so upgrading a backend-only manifest is a one-character edit. Discovery resolves and validates `ui` under the same rules as `server` and `schema` — package-relative, inside the package before and after symlink resolution, a real file, compiled ESM `.js`/`.mjs`, so source TypeScript is rejected rather than assumed to be compiled later. Discovery stays inert: nothing imports, evaluates, mounts, or renders a UI entrypoint, and a test proves a throwing artifact still discovers successfully. This follows `entrypoints.jobs`, declared and resolved since ADR 0006 with no runtime consumer. The name is `ui`, not `dashboard`, because a module's UI must be hostable by Ekklesia's shell and by a standalone host, so the contract cannot be named after one of them; and not `surface`, because `surfaces/*` is a separate ownership layer. No widget, route, icon, folder, menu, layout, or standalone-metadata field is added, and tests assert the manifest still rejects every unknown entrypoint key and offers no hierarchy field. Deliberately unchanged: `scripts/check-boundaries.ts` still enforces `modules-do-not-own-ui`. Relaxing that guard depends entirely on the UI authoring model a later pass chooses, and weakening a working protection before that decision exists would trade real coverage for nothing. A module may therefore declare `ui` today only for a framework-neutral compiled artifact, and the docs say so rather than implying otherwise. Restart-based discovery, explicit operator-invoked migrations, and the trusted compiled-module model are untouched — a module that ships UI is exactly as trusted as one that does not. No Dashboard shell, UI runtime, renderer, framework choice, navigation registry, grouping system, standalone host, installer, hot-loading, or feature module is added by this pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesia
|
d9dd409aa3 |
feat: declare module permissions
Establishes the one canonical PermissionDeclaration contract (packages/contracts/src/authorization.ts) — id/baseline/description, strict, unknown-property-rejecting — consumed by both Core's authorization registry and module manifests, replacing Core's previously separate interface. Bumps the canonical module manifest to manifestVersion 3: permissions become complete declarations instead of bare identifier strings, with manifest-owned namespace and duplicate-id enforcement. Version 2 and bare string-array permissions are rejected outright; there is no compatibility adapter. Adds composePlatformPermissionRegistry (core/src/modules/permissions.ts), a pure, synchronous composer that builds one platform permission registry from Core's own declarations plus every already-discovered module's, in deterministic order, reusing createPermissionRegistry and rejecting any module-contributed permission in the reserved core.* namespace. core/src/authorization remains independent of core/src/modules; only the module integration layer depends on authorization. Updates the module template, module-development docs, authorization docs, and existing manifest fixtures for manifestVersion 3. Does not wire the combined registry into apps/api — that is pass 2. |