9 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	bd34c9c714	feat: add Dashboard navigation as presentation configuration ... Phase 6D pass 1. The shell's navigation was a flat list of module ids, which is not a usable experience — and the obvious fix carries an obvious trap. Letting a module declare its folder, or modelling "Media" as something Livestream and Video belong to, turns a rendering preference into architecture: a folder becomes an owner, membership starts to look like a dependency, and the flat module graph acquires a hierarchy nobody decided on. So the rule comes first: a Dashboard group is a label on a rendering bucket. No manifest, no version, no artifact, no API, no lifecycle; nothing depends on it. Livestream depends on Video because it calls Video's functionality, and that orders startup. Livestream is shown under Media, and that orders nothing. No parent module, child module, owning module, or group-derived dependency appears anywhere in the contracts. No manifest change and no version 5. `manifest.name` has been required since version 1 and already is the module's product identity, so the shell renders "Livestream" instead of `livestream` with nothing added. `suggestedGroup` is deliberately deferred rather than shipped: it would force a hard manifest-version cutover for a hint, and its only correct semantics needs initialization logic that risks a suggestion overwriting an administrator's decision. Defaulting and ownership are different things. Two Core tables (migration 0003) hold groups and placements — server-side, because a church configures its Dashboard rather than one browser; platform-global, because no organization model exists to scope them to. `group_id` is `on delete set null`, so deleting a group ungroups its modules and a dangling reference is impossible. `module_id` carries no foreign key, because modules are packages rather than rows, so a placement for an uninstalled module is retained and restores its position on reinstall. `resolveDashboardNavigation` is a pure function of configuration plus the mountable set: an unplaced module is ungrouped and visible with no initialization write, an absent module renders nothing, empty groups are kept, and ordering is total with the module id as final tie-break. `GET /api/v1/dashboard/navigation` returns the resolved view, layered on top of the host-neutral module UI inventory rather than merged into it — each generic descriptor is embedded untouched, so a standalone host never inherits Dashboard semantics. Reading needs the permission the inventory already needs; organizing needs the new platform permission `core.dashboard.navigation.manage` through a narrow, idempotent, closed-validation mutation contract. No editor UI. The flatness rule is executable: a test discovers real fixtures with a genuine dependency, arranges them four ways including both in one folder and the dependency inverted in presentation, and asserts discovery order, dependency declarations, and the module set stay byte-identical. The end-to-end test organizes a real installation through the real API, mounts a module from inside a group, moves it, and asserts the navigation entry is byte-identical across the move and still mounts the same artifact. The shell's client for the generic inventory became dead code and was removed rather than kept speculatively; the endpoint itself is unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-22 12:44:40 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	616c1d4834	feat: mount discovered module UI in a minimal Ekklesia browser host ... Phase 6C pass 2. Every link in the module UI chain existed except the one that closes it: a module could be authored, built, validated, published at a browser URL, and loaded by a generic loader — and nothing in Ekklesia did any of it. There was no browser application at all. Two pieces were missing. A browser could not discover what to mount, and it must not work that out for itself. GET /api/v1/module-ui is the inventory: per publishable module, its id and version, the server-produced artifact URL, the server-produced root of the module's own API, and the subset of that module's declared permissions the caller holds. Five fields, each because building a ModuleUiHostContext needs it — no filesystem paths, and no name/icon/folder/order, because navigation metadata is a design that does not exist yet. Its module set is the ADR 0025 publication registry rather than a rescan, so the inventory and the artifact route cannot disagree. It requires a new Core permission, core.modules.ui.read (baseline authenticated), because it is precisely the enumeration the anonymous artifact route deliberately withholds. Both URLs are server-produced. moduleUiArtifactUrl already existed; moduleApiBaseUrl is now exported and moduleRoutePath builds on it, so each URL shape has exactly one author. Without it the shell would hardcode /api/v1/modules/<id> — the prefix ADR 0022 forbids a module UI from spelling, reappearing in the host instead. surfaces/shell (@ekklesia/shell) is the repository's first surface: a small React application built to static files by its own esbuild script. It resolves the principal, fetches the inventory, builds the host context entirely from server-derived data, and hands the artifact URL to @ekklesia/module-ui-host. One frame per selection — keyed by module identity — defeats the stale-load race; the host owns the container, the loading state, and every failure, so a broken module costs its own panel rather than the shell. The shell statically imports no module, and both levels are checked: no source import may name a module, and the emitted bundle must contain exactly one dynamic import (the loader's) with no module id, no /api/v1/modules, no eval, and no blob URL. Permission hints come from Core's own evaluator and stay presentation-only — the end-to-end test has a UI holding no grant call its API anyway and still receive 403. Surfaces may now depend only on browser-safe shared roles; @ekklesia/contracts is deliberately excluded, since its barrel pulls Drizzle's types and Node's globals into the browser — the hole ADR 0024 closed one layer down. Not the Dashboard: no navigation, grouping, icons, ordering, design system, or routing. The selector is a list of module ids. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-22 08:55:44 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	44e676f0df	feat: close the browser boundary and add the generic UI host loader ... Two gaps stood between the module UI contract and a host that could use it. ADR 0023 recorded the first honestly but never diagnosed it: a module UI file compiled with `"types": []` could still typecheck `process.env`. The second was simply missing — nothing imported a compiled artifact, checked its identity, mounted it, or tore it down. The leak was one type-only import, bisected against the real type graph rather than guessed. `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk` imported `type { EkklesiaPrincipal } from "@ekklesia/contracts"`. Importing contracts/identity alone is clean and importing Zod alone is clean, but contracts exposes a single barrel entry, so that one import reached module-database, whose Drizzle types re-introduce Node's globals. The runtime was never affected — the import was erased and host-context.js is `export {}` — but a type-graph leak is still a real boundary failure, because it silently permits code that cannot run in its target environment. The fix is not a narrower import path. The SDK now has no dependencies at all, so there is no graph to leak through and no future contracts change can reopen this. It owns `ModuleUiPrincipal`: the same shape ADR 0022 chose, with the Zod brand dropped. That brand encodes a server-side parsing guarantee a browser cannot produce, and it is the same reason `permissions.has` already took a plain string. An Ekklesia host still passes its own `EkklesiaPrincipal` straight through — a branded string is assignable to `string` — while a standalone host builds the literal. Proven the way an author experiences it: two fixtures compiled under the exact project a module uses, one supported and one deliberately reaching for `process`, with the second required to fail on that specific name. `@ekklesia/module-ui-host` is the generic loader, in its own package because the SDK is bundled into every module artifact and host-only loader code has no business shipping there. The boundary checker enforces both directions: modules may not depend on the loader, and the loader may depend only on the SDK plus dev-time tooling. The distinction that shaped the design: Core resolves `entrypoints.ui` to an absolute path on the server's disk, and a browser needs a URL. A loader that accepted the path would test green on a server and fail in every real host, and would quietly own asset publication. So the loader takes a browser-loadable URL and knows nothing about how one is obtained. Ekklesia has no route that publishes installed artifacts, so this is precisely: loader complete, publication deferred. Nothing can mount an installed module UI yet, and the docs say so rather than implying otherwise. Dynamic import is `(url) => import(url)` with a non-analyzable specifier, kept as a runtime import so a host does not statically bundle every installed module or need a hardcoded registry. It is injectable for bundlers needing their own escape hatch, and deliberately not `eval` or `new Function`, which would cost a host `unsafe-eval` in its CSP. Identity is validated through the SDK's existing parser before `mount` runs, so a stale or mismatched bundle never renders. Contract violations propagate unwrapped; the loader adds only import and mount failure codes, sanitized, with the cause attached. Unmount is idempotent, safe when a module returned no cleanup, and marks an instance unmounted before running cleanup so a throwing cleanup surfaces once and never re-runs. A failed mount registers no cleanup. Each instance owns its own state, so two mounts coexist. The loader never mutates the host's container — not on success, failure, or unmount. Tests prove all of it against real module URLs (`data:`, which both browsers and Node import natively) rather than filesystem paths, including one artifact built by the canonical Pass 2 pipeline and run under both an Ekklesia-shaped and a standalone-shaped context. Core, apps/api, and the contracts package are untouched; discovery remains inert. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-21 21:44:42 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	1e5866504e	feat: build module UI into its declared browser artifact ... ADR 0022 defined what a module UI is and selected React and TypeScript as the authoring model, but closed by recording that it was not buildable end to end: `browser.json` preserves JSX, bundler plugins are denied, and nothing turned a module's `.tsx` into the artifact its manifest declares. This closes exactly that gap. esbuild produces the artifact. It was already the right answer before it was chosen: this workspace resolves esbuild 0.28.1 through Vite/Vitest today and `pnpm-workspace.yaml` already carries `allowBuilds: esbuild`, so the pinned dependency adds no second copy and no new trust decision. It is also the smallest tool that covers TSX, ESM, browser platform, bundling, source maps, and a define-time constant with no plugin ecosystem. Vite library mode would drag in `@vitejs/plugin-react`, which the module boundary denies on purpose; `tsc` alone cannot bundle, so its output would carry bare `react/jsx-runtime` imports no browser resolves. React is bundled, not externalized. That follows from ADR 0022 rather than from convenience: `mount()` was made the ABI precisely so React would not be part of the host contract, and externalizing it would reverse that through the build system — every host would have to supply a compatible React, and a standalone host might not use React at all. The cost is real and accepted: duplicate runtimes and a ~570 KB unminified artifact. Sharing one runtime later is a build optimization that cannot change the contract, because the contract is a mount function. Output is browser ESM at `es2022`, unminified so an operator can review what they install, with `process.env.NODE_ENV` substituted — React reads it at module scope and would otherwise touch a Node global that does not exist in a browser. The output path is read from the module's own manifest rather than a build convention, so declared and produced artifacts cannot drift, and it is validated with the same `packageRelativePathSchema` discovery enforces, so a build can never write where discovery would later reject. `@ekklesia/module-ui-build` owns every option; modules own none. It uses the existing `tooling` role that modules could already depend on, so this pass required no boundary relaxation at all. Its `bin` points at a committed launcher rather than compiled output because pnpm links bins during install, before Turborepo builds anything — a bin targeting `dist/cli.js` fails to link on a fresh clone and breaks every module's UI build in CI. A module with no `entrypoints.ui` is not an error; the CLI reports nothing to build and exits zero, so one script serves both kinds of module. Styling is React inline style objects. A stylesheet import fails the build rather than emitting a sidecar `.css` that no manifest declares and no host loads — an undeclared asset would appear to work in tests and silently do nothing in a real host. `templates/module` is the canonical example and now ships optional UI. Its tests build the artifact from source, validate it with `parseModuleUiExport`, mount it into a real DOM, assert the rendered output, and unmount it; the artifact is rebuilt per run so the proof can never pass against stale output, and `dist/` stays gitignored. Because verify runs both `pnpm test` and `pnpm build`, a UI that cannot be produced fails CI through two independent paths. One correction worth stating plainly: the UI TypeScript project declares `"types": []`, and a UI file referencing `process` does fail in isolation, but TypeScript still pulls Node globals in transitively — a file importing `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk` reaches `@ekklesia/contracts` and through its Zod and Drizzle types `process.env` typechecks again. The docs and ADR describe this as the convention it is rather than the guard it is not. Core is untouched. Building is an authoring step; discovery still only validates the artifact a module shipped and never executes or produces one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-21 21:24:18 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	8d651c427d	feat: define the module UI authoring model and host contract ... ADR 0021 established that a module may own UI and added a statically validated, never-executed `entrypoints.ui` path, but deliberately left five questions open: what the artifact exports, what a host provides, how one artifact runs under both Ekklesia and a standalone host, what the browser-side trust model is, and how module UI avoids being welded to a Dashboard that does not exist. This answers them. React and TypeScript are the supported module UI authoring model. The repository already leaned this way: `packages/typescript-config` ships a `browser.json` preset and a `react-native.json` preset with `"jsx": "react-jsx"`, and ADR 0002 names browser and React Native configurations. One framework is supported; every other stays rejected. React is deliberately not part of the contract. A module's compiled artifact default-exports `defineModuleUi({ id, version, mount })`, and `mount(container, context)` takes a DOM element and returns an unmount function. `id` and `version` are build-artifact identity markers a host verifies against the manifest, mirroring `defineModuleRuntime` exactly. A host needs an element and a context, never a matching rendering library, so a module's framework, a host's framework, and the platform boundary between them stay independent. The contract lives in a new `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk` rather than in `@ekklesia/module-sdk`, for a concrete reason: that package re-exports all of `@ekklesia/contracts`, so routing module UI through it would drag Zod, Drizzle, and semver into every browser bundle. The new package has no runtime dependencies, and its one dependency on contracts is type-only — the emitted `host-context.js` is `export {};`, and a test pins that so it cannot regress. The host context is four members: `moduleId`, `api`, `principal`, and `permissions`. Navigation, theme, module configuration, organization context, and diagnostics are deliberately absent; each needs a design that does not exist. Module UI reaches its backend through `api.request(path)` with a path relative to its own API root and never constructs `/api/v1/modules/<id>/...`, which is Ekklesia's private deployment detail — a module that builds that URL is silently unhostable anywhere else. One fixture artifact is mounted under two hosts with different origins and URL shapes to prove it. Client-side permission hints are presentation only, and both the docs and a test say so plainly: a denied hint does not stop the module from calling its API, because server-side `requirePermission` is the only authority. Module UI is trusted code in the host's own browser realm — no iframe, no sandbox — which matches the backend model rather than overstating it, since a module's server half already holds the API's database authority. The boundary guard is narrowed precisely, not removed: `.tsx`, `react`, and `react-dom` are un-denied and modules may depend on the new `module-ui-sdk` role. `.jsx`, `.css`, every other framework, `react-router-dom`, `react-native`, and `@vitejs/plugin-react` stay denied, layer rules are untouched, and an unsupported framework aliased behind an allowed name (`"react": "npm:vue@3"`) is resolved and rejected by its real target. Fixtures prove each case, including that module UI source still cannot import Core. Core, apps/api, and the manifest contract are untouched. Discovery still validates the `entrypoints.ui` path and never evaluates it; hosts perform their own dynamic import and validate the result with `parseModuleUiExport`. No Dashboard shell, UI runtime, navigation, grouping, standalone host, build or styling pipeline, installer, hot-loading, or feature module is added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-21 20:52:47 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5	44ba259f58	feat: establish the module product contract ... Ekklesia's module model has been backend-only since ADR 0001: a module owns domain behavior and data, and every presentation concern belongs to a surface. That prevents a module author — the person who knows the domain — from shipping the screen that makes their module useful, and it guarantees a module and its own UI drift apart. It also pushes toward two codebases for one domain the moment a module needs to run standalone. ADR 0021 replaces that rule. A module is an independently versioned product that owns its domain behavior, data, permissions, routes, migrations, and its own UI, hostable inside Ekklesia and — from the same implementation — by a later standalone host. Core keeps the containing application shell and every platform policy: authentication, authorization enforcement, platform context, top-level routing, navigation, global theme, error boundaries, and trusted-origin/CORS. The module graph stays flat: modules are peers, genuine module and capability dependencies remain the only relationships, and Dashboard folders are presentation configuration an administrator can reorganize, never module architecture. This pass implements the static contract only. `manifestVersion` moves to 4 and `entrypoints` gains one optional field, `ui`. Version 3's `entrypoints` is strict and rejects `ui`, so this is an incompatible shape change and version 3 is now rejected outright rather than reinterpreted, exactly as version 1 was by version 2 and version 2 by version 3. Every field version 4 adds is optional, so upgrading a backend-only manifest is a one-character edit. Discovery resolves and validates `ui` under the same rules as `server` and `schema` — package-relative, inside the package before and after symlink resolution, a real file, compiled ESM `.js`/`.mjs`, so source TypeScript is rejected rather than assumed to be compiled later. Discovery stays inert: nothing imports, evaluates, mounts, or renders a UI entrypoint, and a test proves a throwing artifact still discovers successfully. This follows `entrypoints.jobs`, declared and resolved since ADR 0006 with no runtime consumer. The name is `ui`, not `dashboard`, because a module's UI must be hostable by Ekklesia's shell and by a standalone host, so the contract cannot be named after one of them; and not `surface`, because `surfaces/*` is a separate ownership layer. No widget, route, icon, folder, menu, layout, or standalone-metadata field is added, and tests assert the manifest still rejects every unknown entrypoint key and offers no hierarchy field. Deliberately unchanged: `scripts/check-boundaries.ts` still enforces `modules-do-not-own-ui`. Relaxing that guard depends entirely on the UI authoring model a later pass chooses, and weakening a working protection before that decision exists would trade real coverage for nothing. A module may therefore declare `ui` today only for a framework-neutral compiled artifact, and the docs say so rather than implying otherwise. Restart-based discovery, explicit operator-invoked migrations, and the trusted compiled-module model are untouched — a module that ships UI is exactly as trusted as one that does not. No Dashboard shell, UI runtime, renderer, framework choice, navigation registry, grouping system, standalone host, installer, hot-loading, or feature module is added by this pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>	2026-08-21 20:20:41 -05:00
ekklesia	831a48187c	test: add PostgreSQL migration integration coverage	2026-07-21 09:37:15 -05:00
ekklesia	57552a21a4	feat: add module contracts and discovery	2026-07-12 22:14:01 -05:00
ekklesia	192a6514cf	chore: establish Ekklesia platform foundation	2026-07-12 20:28:19 -05:00