db67cf7700df4fc32cd510b80ddb6048678a3f07
9
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
bd34c9c714 |
feat: add Dashboard navigation as presentation configuration
Phase 6D pass 1. The shell's navigation was a flat list of module ids, which is not a usable experience — and the obvious fix carries an obvious trap. Letting a module declare its folder, or modelling "Media" as something Livestream and Video belong to, turns a rendering preference into architecture: a folder becomes an owner, membership starts to look like a dependency, and the flat module graph acquires a hierarchy nobody decided on. So the rule comes first: a Dashboard group is a label on a rendering bucket. No manifest, no version, no artifact, no API, no lifecycle; nothing depends on it. Livestream depends on Video because it calls Video's functionality, and that orders startup. Livestream is shown under Media, and that orders nothing. No parent module, child module, owning module, or group-derived dependency appears anywhere in the contracts. No manifest change and no version 5. `manifest.name` has been required since version 1 and already is the module's product identity, so the shell renders "Livestream" instead of `livestream` with nothing added. `suggestedGroup` is deliberately deferred rather than shipped: it would force a hard manifest-version cutover for a hint, and its only correct semantics needs initialization logic that risks a suggestion overwriting an administrator's decision. Defaulting and ownership are different things. Two Core tables (migration 0003) hold groups and placements — server-side, because a church configures its Dashboard rather than one browser; platform-global, because no organization model exists to scope them to. `group_id` is `on delete set null`, so deleting a group ungroups its modules and a dangling reference is impossible. `module_id` carries no foreign key, because modules are packages rather than rows, so a placement for an uninstalled module is retained and restores its position on reinstall. `resolveDashboardNavigation` is a pure function of configuration plus the mountable set: an unplaced module is ungrouped and visible with no initialization write, an absent module renders nothing, empty groups are kept, and ordering is total with the module id as final tie-break. `GET /api/v1/dashboard/navigation` returns the resolved view, layered on top of the host-neutral module UI inventory rather than merged into it — each generic descriptor is embedded untouched, so a standalone host never inherits Dashboard semantics. Reading needs the permission the inventory already needs; organizing needs the new platform permission `core.dashboard.navigation.manage` through a narrow, idempotent, closed-validation mutation contract. No editor UI. The flatness rule is executable: a test discovers real fixtures with a genuine dependency, arranges them four ways including both in one folder and the dependency inverted in presentation, and asserts discovery order, dependency declarations, and the module set stay byte-identical. The end-to-end test organizes a real installation through the real API, mounts a module from inside a group, moves it, and asserts the navigation entry is byte-identical across the move and still mounts the same artifact. The shell's client for the generic inventory became dead code and was removed rather than kept speculatively; the endpoint itself is unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
616c1d4834 |
feat: mount discovered module UI in a minimal Ekklesia browser host
Phase 6C pass 2. Every link in the module UI chain existed except the one that closes it: a module could be authored, built, validated, published at a browser URL, and loaded by a generic loader — and nothing in Ekklesia did any of it. There was no browser application at all. Two pieces were missing. A browser could not discover what to mount, and it must not work that out for itself. GET /api/v1/module-ui is the inventory: per publishable module, its id and version, the server-produced artifact URL, the server-produced root of the module's own API, and the subset of that module's declared permissions the caller holds. Five fields, each because building a ModuleUiHostContext needs it — no filesystem paths, and no name/icon/folder/order, because navigation metadata is a design that does not exist yet. Its module set is the ADR 0025 publication registry rather than a rescan, so the inventory and the artifact route cannot disagree. It requires a new Core permission, core.modules.ui.read (baseline authenticated), because it is precisely the enumeration the anonymous artifact route deliberately withholds. Both URLs are server-produced. moduleUiArtifactUrl already existed; moduleApiBaseUrl is now exported and moduleRoutePath builds on it, so each URL shape has exactly one author. Without it the shell would hardcode /api/v1/modules/<id> — the prefix ADR 0022 forbids a module UI from spelling, reappearing in the host instead. surfaces/shell (@ekklesia/shell) is the repository's first surface: a small React application built to static files by its own esbuild script. It resolves the principal, fetches the inventory, builds the host context entirely from server-derived data, and hands the artifact URL to @ekklesia/module-ui-host. One frame per selection — keyed by module identity — defeats the stale-load race; the host owns the container, the loading state, and every failure, so a broken module costs its own panel rather than the shell. The shell statically imports no module, and both levels are checked: no source import may name a module, and the emitted bundle must contain exactly one dynamic import (the loader's) with no module id, no /api/v1/modules, no eval, and no blob URL. Permission hints come from Core's own evaluator and stay presentation-only — the end-to-end test has a UI holding no grant call its API anyway and still receive 403. Surfaces may now depend only on browser-safe shared roles; @ekklesia/contracts is deliberately excluded, since its barrel pulls Drizzle's types and Node's globals into the browser — the hole ADR 0024 closed one layer down. Not the Dashboard: no navigation, grouping, icons, ordering, design system, or routing. The selector is a list of module ids. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
a02deb9433 |
feat: publish validated module UI artifacts at a platform-owned URL
Phase 6C pass 1. ADR 0024 named the one thing missing between the module UI build pipeline and the generic host loader: Core resolves entrypoints.ui to an absolute server filesystem path, and a browser needs a URL. This adds that publication layer. Core owns the policy. createModuleUiPublicationRegistry builds, from the discovered and started module inventory, the answer to "may this be published, and which exact file is it?" — publishable means the module survived discovery and declares entrypoints.ui, with no new lifecycle state and no installer. apps/api owns the transport: GET /api/v1/module-ui/<module-id>/<version>. Both segments are lookup keys, not path components. An exact match yields the canonical artifact path discovery already validated; no request value is ever composed into a filesystem path, and the route declares no wildcard segment, so traversal, encoded separators, sibling chunks, package-root files, and source maps are unreachable by construction. An installed module directory never becomes a static file root. The prefix is a sibling of /api/v1/modules/, not a child: `ui` is a legal module route segment, so a module registering GET /ui/:version would otherwise compete with the platform for one URL with routing order deciding the winner. The route requires no authentication, deliberately. Fetching the bundle confers no authority, and a cookie-gated route would break cross-origin import(), which sends none. The cost is stated rather than hidden: a caller who knows a module id and its exact version can download that bundle. The three failure modes return one identical 404 so the route is not an enumeration oracle. Caching is no-cache with a strong SHA-256 ETag and RFC 9110 If-None-Match handling, not immutable: without an installer nothing stops a version being rebuilt with different bytes. The server reads bytes and writes bytes — never imports, evaluates, or transforms the artifact. Nothing mounts a module UI. A host could now obtain a URL, which was previously impossible; there is still no Dashboard shell, navigation, or metadata endpoint. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
44e676f0df |
feat: close the browser boundary and add the generic UI host loader
Two gaps stood between the module UI contract and a host that could use
it. ADR 0023 recorded the first honestly but never diagnosed it: a module
UI file compiled with `"types": []` could still typecheck `process.env`.
The second was simply missing — nothing imported a compiled artifact,
checked its identity, mounted it, or tore it down.
The leak was one type-only import, bisected against the real type graph
rather than guessed. `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk` imported
`type { EkklesiaPrincipal } from "@ekklesia/contracts"`. Importing
contracts/identity alone is clean and importing Zod alone is clean, but
contracts exposes a single barrel entry, so that one import reached
module-database, whose Drizzle types re-introduce Node's globals. The
runtime was never affected — the import was erased and host-context.js is
`export {}` — but a type-graph leak is still a real boundary failure,
because it silently permits code that cannot run in its target
environment.
The fix is not a narrower import path. The SDK now has no dependencies at
all, so there is no graph to leak through and no future contracts change
can reopen this. It owns `ModuleUiPrincipal`: the same shape ADR 0022
chose, with the Zod brand dropped. That brand encodes a server-side
parsing guarantee a browser cannot produce, and it is the same reason
`permissions.has` already took a plain string. An Ekklesia host still
passes its own `EkklesiaPrincipal` straight through — a branded string is
assignable to `string` — while a standalone host builds the literal.
Proven the way an author experiences it: two fixtures compiled under the
exact project a module uses, one supported and one deliberately reaching
for `process`, with the second required to fail on that specific name.
`@ekklesia/module-ui-host` is the generic loader, in its own package
because the SDK is bundled into every module artifact and host-only
loader code has no business shipping there. The boundary checker enforces
both directions: modules may not depend on the loader, and the loader may
depend only on the SDK plus dev-time tooling.
The distinction that shaped the design: Core resolves `entrypoints.ui` to
an absolute path on the server's disk, and a browser needs a URL. A
loader that accepted the path would test green on a server and fail in
every real host, and would quietly own asset publication. So the loader
takes a browser-loadable URL and knows nothing about how one is obtained.
Ekklesia has no route that publishes installed artifacts, so this is
precisely: loader complete, publication deferred. Nothing can mount an
installed module UI yet, and the docs say so rather than implying
otherwise.
Dynamic import is `(url) => import(url)` with a non-analyzable specifier,
kept as a runtime import so a host does not statically bundle every
installed module or need a hardcoded registry. It is injectable for
bundlers needing their own escape hatch, and deliberately not `eval` or
`new Function`, which would cost a host `unsafe-eval` in its CSP.
Identity is validated through the SDK's existing parser before `mount`
runs, so a stale or mismatched bundle never renders. Contract violations
propagate unwrapped; the loader adds only import and mount failure codes,
sanitized, with the cause attached. Unmount is idempotent, safe when a
module returned no cleanup, and marks an instance unmounted before
running cleanup so a throwing cleanup surfaces once and never re-runs. A
failed mount registers no cleanup. Each instance owns its own state, so
two mounts coexist. The loader never mutates the host's container — not
on success, failure, or unmount.
Tests prove all of it against real module URLs (`data:`, which both
browsers and Node import natively) rather than filesystem paths,
including one artifact built by the canonical Pass 2 pipeline and run
under both an Ekklesia-shaped and a standalone-shaped context. Core,
apps/api, and the contracts package are untouched; discovery remains
inert.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
|
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
8d651c427d |
feat: define the module UI authoring model and host contract
ADR 0021 established that a module may own UI and added a statically
validated, never-executed `entrypoints.ui` path, but deliberately left
five questions open: what the artifact exports, what a host provides,
how one artifact runs under both Ekklesia and a standalone host, what
the browser-side trust model is, and how module UI avoids being welded
to a Dashboard that does not exist. This answers them.
React and TypeScript are the supported module UI authoring model. The
repository already leaned this way: `packages/typescript-config` ships a
`browser.json` preset and a `react-native.json` preset with
`"jsx": "react-jsx"`, and ADR 0002 names browser and React Native
configurations. One framework is supported; every other stays rejected.
React is deliberately not part of the contract. A module's compiled
artifact default-exports `defineModuleUi({ id, version, mount })`, and
`mount(container, context)` takes a DOM element and returns an unmount
function. `id` and `version` are build-artifact identity markers a host
verifies against the manifest, mirroring `defineModuleRuntime` exactly.
A host needs an element and a context, never a matching rendering
library, so a module's framework, a host's framework, and the platform
boundary between them stay independent.
The contract lives in a new `@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk` rather than in
`@ekklesia/module-sdk`, for a concrete reason: that package re-exports
all of `@ekklesia/contracts`, so routing module UI through it would drag
Zod, Drizzle, and semver into every browser bundle. The new package has
no runtime dependencies, and its one dependency on contracts is
type-only — the emitted `host-context.js` is `export {};`, and a test
pins that so it cannot regress.
The host context is four members: `moduleId`, `api`, `principal`, and
`permissions`. Navigation, theme, module configuration, organization
context, and diagnostics are deliberately absent; each needs a design
that does not exist. Module UI reaches its backend through
`api.request(path)` with a path relative to its own API root and never
constructs `/api/v1/modules/<id>/...`, which is Ekklesia's private
deployment detail — a module that builds that URL is silently unhostable
anywhere else. One fixture artifact is mounted under two hosts with
different origins and URL shapes to prove it.
Client-side permission hints are presentation only, and both the docs
and a test say so plainly: a denied hint does not stop the module from
calling its API, because server-side `requirePermission` is the only
authority. Module UI is trusted code in the host's own browser realm —
no iframe, no sandbox — which matches the backend model rather than
overstating it, since a module's server half already holds the API's
database authority.
The boundary guard is narrowed precisely, not removed: `.tsx`, `react`,
and `react-dom` are un-denied and modules may depend on the new
`module-ui-sdk` role. `.jsx`, `.css`, every other framework,
`react-router-dom`, `react-native`, and `@vitejs/plugin-react` stay
denied, layer rules are untouched, and an unsupported framework aliased
behind an allowed name (`"react": "npm:vue@3"`) is resolved and rejected
by its real target. Fixtures prove each case, including that module UI
source still cannot import Core.
Core, apps/api, and the manifest contract are untouched. Discovery still
validates the `entrypoints.ui` path and never evaluates it; hosts
perform their own dynamic import and validate the result with
`parseModuleUiExport`. No Dashboard shell, UI runtime, navigation,
grouping, standalone host, build or styling pipeline, installer,
hot-loading, or feature module is added.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
|
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
44ba259f58 |
feat: establish the module product contract
Ekklesia's module model has been backend-only since ADR 0001: a module owns domain behavior and data, and every presentation concern belongs to a surface. That prevents a module author — the person who knows the domain — from shipping the screen that makes their module useful, and it guarantees a module and its own UI drift apart. It also pushes toward two codebases for one domain the moment a module needs to run standalone. ADR 0021 replaces that rule. A module is an independently versioned product that owns its domain behavior, data, permissions, routes, migrations, and its own UI, hostable inside Ekklesia and — from the same implementation — by a later standalone host. Core keeps the containing application shell and every platform policy: authentication, authorization enforcement, platform context, top-level routing, navigation, global theme, error boundaries, and trusted-origin/CORS. The module graph stays flat: modules are peers, genuine module and capability dependencies remain the only relationships, and Dashboard folders are presentation configuration an administrator can reorganize, never module architecture. This pass implements the static contract only. `manifestVersion` moves to 4 and `entrypoints` gains one optional field, `ui`. Version 3's `entrypoints` is strict and rejects `ui`, so this is an incompatible shape change and version 3 is now rejected outright rather than reinterpreted, exactly as version 1 was by version 2 and version 2 by version 3. Every field version 4 adds is optional, so upgrading a backend-only manifest is a one-character edit. Discovery resolves and validates `ui` under the same rules as `server` and `schema` — package-relative, inside the package before and after symlink resolution, a real file, compiled ESM `.js`/`.mjs`, so source TypeScript is rejected rather than assumed to be compiled later. Discovery stays inert: nothing imports, evaluates, mounts, or renders a UI entrypoint, and a test proves a throwing artifact still discovers successfully. This follows `entrypoints.jobs`, declared and resolved since ADR 0006 with no runtime consumer. The name is `ui`, not `dashboard`, because a module's UI must be hostable by Ekklesia's shell and by a standalone host, so the contract cannot be named after one of them; and not `surface`, because `surfaces/*` is a separate ownership layer. No widget, route, icon, folder, menu, layout, or standalone-metadata field is added, and tests assert the manifest still rejects every unknown entrypoint key and offers no hierarchy field. Deliberately unchanged: `scripts/check-boundaries.ts` still enforces `modules-do-not-own-ui`. Relaxing that guard depends entirely on the UI authoring model a later pass chooses, and weakening a working protection before that decision exists would trade real coverage for nothing. A module may therefore declare `ui` today only for a framework-neutral compiled artifact, and the docs say so rather than implying otherwise. Restart-based discovery, explicit operator-invoked migrations, and the trusted compiled-module model are untouched — a module that ships UI is exactly as trusted as one that does not. No Dashboard shell, UI runtime, renderer, framework choice, navigation registry, grouping system, standalone host, installer, hot-loading, or feature module is added by this pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
288c088377 |
docs: close Phase 5D security hardening
The documentation still described Phase 5D as in progress, Phase 6 as blocked, and a disposable-runner isolation proof as a prerequisite for opening the real pull request. All five passes and the independent whole-repository re-audit have landed, so those statements no longer match the accepted operating model. The README's current status now records Phase 5D as complete under the current trusted-contributor, not-yet-deployed threat model, with Phase 6 unblocked, and gains a pass 5 closure paragraph covering the re-audit, the repository-local supply-chain and dependency fixes, the accepted trusted-code-only CI boundary, and what remains required before untrusted CI or a public launch. The pass 1-4 paragraphs keep their technical content unchanged; only their tense changes, so each reads as what was outstanding at the close of that pass rather than as a current claim. `platform-architecture.md` no longer stops at pass 1 or says passes 2-5 are unfinished; it summarizes all five passes and defers the remaining operational limitations to the security document. `security.md` states the trusted-code-only operating rule explicitly and replaces "CI blockers before the real pull request is opened" with "Requirements before executing untrusted contributions", framing the five hardening items as prerequisites for relaxing that rule rather than as Phase 6 blockers, and naming an isolated hosted-runner service as an accepted alternative. The Gitea 1.24.2 warnings, the scope of `persist-credentials: false`, and the unverified runner topology and job-token authority are preserved verbatim; no external Gitea setting is claimed. The launch checklist is marked as gating a public launch, not development. Both Doctor examples are corrected to the real three-migration output, adding `core:0002_authorization_integrity · 634294731180`. The stale sentence calling Core authorization the next architectural phase is refreshed. ADRs 0017-0020 are untouched: their statements that later passes were outstanding are historical records made when each was accepted. Documentation only — no production code, test, workflow, dependency, migration, or schema change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
a2db774b8c |
docs: correct Gitea Actions guarantees
The security document claimed the CI workflow "is least privilege" because it declares `permissions: contents: read`. That is not true on the server this repository actually uses. The inventoried server is Gitea 1.24.2, and its official comparison page lists `permissions` / `jobs.<job_id>.permissions`, `concurrency`, and `jobs.<job_id>.timeout-minutes` under unsupported workflow syntax — verified against https://docs.gitea.com/1.24/usage/actions/comparison rather than assumed. On this server those keys are inert, so the branch cannot claim the in-job GITEA_TOKEN is read-only, and cannot claim YAML-enforced timeout or concurrency behavior. Job-token permission controls, repository/owner defaults, and server-side maximum-permission clamping arrive in the 1.26 feature line (https://docs.gitea.com/1.26/usage/actions/token-permissions). The document now separates what is actually true of this repository — full-SHA action pins, frozen-lockfile install, no pull_request_target, no referenced secret, `persist-credentials: false` on every checkout, and the declared `permissions` block — from what the server enforces. It also states precisely what `persist-credentials: false` proves: checkout leaves no credential in `.git/config` for a later step, which is not the same as removing or reducing the job token. The CI blockers are recorded: upgrade to a reviewed supported release, configure repository/owner defaults and a maximum permission, prove against the real server what the token cannot do, move timeout/cancellation/ teardown into the trusted provisioner and reaper, and finish the disposable-guest proof before opening the real pull request. The workflow keeps every declaration — they are already correct for a supported Gitea release and for GitHub Actions — and gains a comment saying plainly that this server ignores them, so no future reader mistakes them for enforcement. Nothing about runners, proxies, firewalls, or deployment is asserted here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
07a3c61083 |
docs: define deployment trust boundaries
One canonical security document, linked from the README, platform architecture, and module-development guide, stating what the boundaries actually protect against — and, more importantly, what they do not. Installed modules are trusted compiled backend code. A module runs arbitrary JavaScript inside the API process and shares its PostgreSQL role and pool, so `ModuleDatabase.execute` gives it the API's full database authority over every table, including identity, grants, owner, bootstrap, and audit. Table prefixes, manifests, permission declarations, route validation, frozen contexts, typed facades, and the capability registry are correctness and coordination boundaries that assume a cooperative module; none of them constrains one that is not. There is no process, container, syscall, filesystem, network, database-role, schema, tenant, or resource sandbox between a module and Core, and the document says so in those words, along with what would have to be built before untrusted modules could be accepted. It also records the honest deployment state: Ekklesia is not deployed. There is no production instance, reverse proxy, public listener, or deployment automation anywhere in this repository, and no `.env` has ever been committed. The loopback listen default and the production signup refusal are real, but a config default is not a firewall, so the origin-reachability, proxy-overwrite, header-spoofing, and trusted-peer properties a public launch needs are written as a launch-blocking checklist rather than as guarantees. The per-process authentication limiter is described as exactly that, valid only while signup stays disabled and exactly one instance serves traffic. The CI section records the workflow's verified posture and deliberately stops there: a pull request can edit `runs-on`, so a workflow file cannot be the boundary, and the runner topology is not described as though it had been verified. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |