5 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5	98e59d4ba0	chore(release): prepare 0.2.0 ... Every platform workspace package and every public @ekklesia/* package declares 0.2.0, and the deploy README's image build example names it. templates/module keeps its own version. 0.2.0, not 0.1.3: before 1.0 a minor version is the breaking one (docs/development/releases.md, ADR 0054), and since 0.1.2 main has broken modules, module authors, and operators: - #64 (ADR 0048): one generic image; installed modules live outside it; - #66, #72 (ADR 0049, 0050): modules install as Module Package v1, and move to the Module Database ABI; - #71: the manifest v8 cutover; v7 manifests are refused; - #79 (ADR 0053): the curated SDK drops defineModuleSchema and the legacy ModuleDatabase type; plus #67 (AGPL), #74, #77 (licensing, native targets), and the public package train (#80, #81). It is also the first package train to publish: 0.1.2 never will be. Because 0.2.0 is outside ^0.1.0, the same change moves to ^0.2.0: - the standalone fixture's @ekklesia ranges and its exact module-pack pin; - the compatibility ranges of the modules built for this release: the template, the standalone fixture, and the native proof module; - the test fixtures that model a module of the current release, or the current platform's versions; - the module-development guide's examples, and the release guide, which now names what a minor bump moves. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-08 17:26:13 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5	486356a01e	docs: ADR 0054, Ekklesia's module-development packages are publicly readable before launch ... ADR 0053 was accepted assuming a private package phase before launch. The project owner has decided otherwise: Ekklesia is not secret, its source is already public, and only publication must be restricted. ADR 0054 supersedes ADR 0053 only where it describes that phase as private or requires authenticated package reads. Packages may be read anonymously, which is neither a launch nor an API stability promise beyond pre-1.0 SemVer; publication stays authenticated and restricted; published versions stay immutable; the River_of_Glory_Church Gitea namespace is an acceptable host; a public launch remains a separate decision. Every other ADR 0053 decision is unchanged. ADR 0053 gets only a cross-reference line. The ADR index, the release and module-development guides, the README status, and the publish workflow's comment now point at ADR 0054. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-08 10:24:17 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5	d3c62e63bf	feat: publish the exact @ekklesia package train to the npm registry (ADR 0053) ... Publishes one package release train to the Gitea npm registry under River_of_Glory_Church, whose packages are publicly readable on purpose: exactly the .tgz files the package-release gate proved, and nothing else. Nothing is published by this change. - scripts/publish-package-train.ts validates the whole local train before any request (gate manifest hash, version, revision, unmodified source, the nine packages, every artifact's size, SHA-256, integrity, SHA256SUMS line, and inner package.json), then publishes in dependency order with `npm publish <file.tgz>` under a staging tag. Each package is reconciled first (absent: publish; same bytes: accept; other bytes: hard stop, version burned), then read back: metadata (name, version, integrity, dependency maps, normalized bin, tarball on the registry) and the tarball itself, byte for byte, also anonymously. `latest` moves only after all nine verify; reruns converge and never delete anything. It writes a publication record. The token comes from EKKLESIA_PACKAGES_PUBLISH_TOKEN only, through a temporary npm config that refers to the variable. - scripts/test-package-publication.sh proves it against a disposable Gitea 1.27.2 with public owners, a publisher team and an outsider: anonymous reads, refused unauthorized publishing, byte-identical round trips, the registry's own 409, partial-train recovery, the burned version hard stop, and dist-tag retry convergence. - CI: package-release keeps its proven release and hands it on as an artifact with its manifest hash; the new package-publication job publishes exactly that artifact to the disposable Gitea. Artifact actions v3 (node20): v4 refuses any server other than github.com. - .github/workflows/publish-packages.yml publishes to the real registry only by manual dispatch on main, after its own gate run, with the secret in the publish step alone. - docs: the public-read model, the workflow, the record, credentials, immutability policy, provider moves, and the first-publication steps. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-08 09:49:27 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5	4f1b1d68c7	fix: keep pnpm's package store out of the release builder's clean-source check ... The package-release job failed its clean-tree assertion in CI. Reproduced as root in a container with a bind-mounted checkout, as the Gitea runner does: after checkout the tree is clean; `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` then creates `.pnpm-store/` (17,272 untracked files) at the checkout's root, because pnpm keeps its store on the node_modules file system and the checkout is its own mount; `pnpm build` changes nothing. No tracked file is ever modified. - `.pnpm-store/` is ignored, like node_modules: a package cache, never source. The clean-commit requirement is unchanged for every tracked file and every untracked file Git does not ignore. - The clean-tree failure now lists `git status --short` and `git diff --stat`. - Nothing is built before the clean-source assertion: the gate no longer runs a global `pnpm build` first. The builder asserts a clean tree, builds, then fails if its build changed the tree, before packing. Core's verifier is built after both releases, for the consumer proof only. - Every secondary offline install (the second worktree, the consumer module) uses the workspace install's own store explicitly, since pnpm picks a store per file system and those directories are on another. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-08 08:43:19 -05:00
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5	9debe4e891	feat: the public @ekklesia package release train, built, reproduced, and proven (ADR 0053) ... Produces the exact public package tarballs of a platform release, validates them, and proves a standalone module consumes those artifacts end to end. Nothing is published and no credential is configured. - scripts/package-release.ts (pnpm packages:release) is the canonical release builder: from a clean commit it rebuilds the nine public packages from clean output, packs each, inspects every tarball, checks the release set and coordinated versions, and only then writes ekklesia-packages-<version>/ with the tarballs, SHA256SUMS, and a provider-neutral manifest (ekklesia-package-train.json: version, revision, and each package's file, size, SHA-256, npm integrity). - Packing uses a pack-only pnpm beforePacking hook (passed with --config.pnpmfile, never the workspace's install settings). pnpm inserts rewritten workspace: dependencies in async completion order, so two checkouts of one commit packed module-pack's package.json with keys in a different order; the hook restores the source key order (and the inspection enforces it). It also drops devDependencies, which named private packages outside the train. - scripts/test-package-release.sh (pnpm test:package-release, the CI package-release gate) builds the train twice, the second time from a separate worktree, requires byte-identical release directories, then runs the standalone consumer proof on the release: manifest checked, offline install from the tarballs only, lockfile integrity equal to the manifest's, frozen-lockfile reinstall, no Drizzle, one React, contracts only transitive, every @ekklesia package and module-pack at the release version, skipLibCheck: false, UI build, pack, and Core verification. - docs/development/releases.md documents the release order, the train, the artifacts, and the reproducibility findings; registry publication remains unimplemented. - ADR 0053 is Accepted: everything it decides that does not need a registry is now proven, and registry provisioning is on its own Deferred list. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>	2026-10-08 08:02:41 -05:00