e36485bf9995667aa6d9ddbf8826ed996fcab755
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
c444ff570b |
feat: let one module contribute a browser renderer to another's capability
The platform has had a complete story for one module using another's
*backend* since ADR 0006 — capabilities, versioned ranges, provider
registration. It has had none at all for one module using another's *browser*
code, and every workaround is wrong in a way that matters: a consumer cannot
import a peer module, it cannot re-implement a renderer for a domain it does
not own, and a second `entrypoints` role would put the platform in charge of
deciding when a slot inside someone else's screen should be filled.
Add a generic browser contribution. `manifestVersion: 7` declares one:
namespaced id, its own version, a target capability, a compatible range, and
one artifact. That is the complete list, and the omissions are the decision —
no payload schema, slot, ordering, or rendering hint exists anywhere, so Core
cannot learn what a slide is because the declaration cannot express it.
Discovery resolves a contribution artifact through the *identical* loop every
other compiled entrypoint uses, inheriting the path, containment, symlink,
extension, and file-kind checks rather than getting a weaker copy of them. The
registry publishes one only when another eligible module provides the target
capability within the declared range; otherwise it is absent rather than
mounted and broken. `apps/api` serves it as a sibling of the artifact and
display routes, with the same policy: three lookup keys, one exact match, one
already-validated path, and one indistinguishable 404 for unknown, undeclared,
stale, and incompatible alike.
A consumer discovers through the host, never through a URL. Its descriptor
carries identity, version, and capability; the URL stays server-side and is
resolved exactly as `api.request("records")` is. A module can only ever see
contributions aimed at a capability it itself provides, and cannot name its
way to anything else — a mount for a withheld id fails without fetching.
The consumer owns the domain contract entirely. Input is opaque JSON, checked
structurally so a Date, a function, a cycle, or `undefined` fails at the
boundary rather than vanishing somewhere far from the mistake, and checked for
nothing else. A contributed renderer receives its own id and that input: no
API client, realtime, principal, configuration, database, storage, or
credential. Loading one grants its module nothing.
The contribution ABI is versioned separately from the module UI ABI, because
the two have different shapes and lifecycles and coupling them would force
every module to rebuild whenever either moved. It supports asynchronous
readiness, update-without-remount (a screen that remounted per tick would
restart animations and reload media), deterministic cleanup in a `finally`,
and sanitized failure that never carries the consumer's domain data. Each
renderer mounts in its own isolated root with its own stylesheet.
The template now declares a contribution, so `pnpm build` exercises the whole
authoring path, and the shell suite drives the full relationship — one module
discovering, mounting, updating, and unmounting another's React renderer with
neither importing the other.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
|
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
07835b7b56 |
feat: give module UI real stylesheets, and every artifact its own root
ADR 0023 refused stylesheet imports for a good reason: esbuild would emit a
`.css` sidecar beside the artifact, nothing would declare it, no host would
fetch it, and it would work in a local test and silently do nothing in a real
host. Inline style objects were the whole story. They cannot express
`:hover`, `:focus-visible`, `:disabled`, `@media`, or `@keyframes` — so an
accessible focus treatment was not expressible, and the shared elements added
in the previous commit are built from real CSS for exactly that reason.
Compile the stylesheet into the artifact instead of beside it. A module
imports plain `.css`; the canonical builder resolves local `@import`s through
a nested bundle and turns each file into its compiled text, which the author
declares as `defineModuleUi({ styles })`. One declared file still contains
everything: nothing extra to publish, nothing to fetch, and no way for CSS to
become an asset nobody serves. The build additionally fails if a CSS output
ever appears beside an artifact, so a future loader change cannot bring the
sidecar back. Two rules are enforced with their own codes: a module stylesheet
may reference `--ekklesia-*` and never declare one, and every `@import` must
resolve locally or the artifact would fetch styles at run time. Plain `.css`
only; other dialects are a toolchain decision needing their own ADR.
Then make the isolation real. The generic loader mounts every browser artifact
— primary, display, and later a contributed renderer — inside an open Shadow
DOM root it creates, installs the artifact's stylesheet there, and hands the
artifact an element inside it. Shadow DOM is the one mechanism a browser
actually enforces; a class prefix or a "scope your selectors" instruction is a
convention one mistake defeats, and the failure mode is a module silently
restyling the Dashboard. It applies unconditionally, including to artifacts
with no stylesheet, because a conditional boundary is one a module can fall
out of by editing a source file. Both wrappers are `display: contents` through
base rules installed before the artifact's own, so layout is unchanged and a
full-viewport display can still override `:host`. Unmount removes the whole
root in a `finally`, so a cleanup that throws cannot leave styles behind, and
remounting cannot accumulate a second copy.
This is a correctness boundary for styles and is not described as a sandbox:
the root is `open` precisely because module code is trusted, same-realm code
that could reach `document` anyway.
An artifact's DOM is no longer a direct child of the host's element, so the
mount ABI is versioned explicitly. `defineModuleUi` stamps
`MODULE_UI_ABI_VERSION` so it can never drift from the SDK the artifact
compiled against, and a version-1 artifact fails with its own code — "rebuild
your module", not a typo hunt. No dual acceptance, matching every manifest
cutover here. Migration is one `pnpm build`.
`pnpm boundaries` allows `.css` only under `src/ui/` and `src/display/`: a
stylesheet anywhere else in a module is the undeclared sidecar again, just
relocated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
|
||
|
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5
|
80189c8ae2 |
feat: give display devices their own paired identity
ADR 0033 gave Ekklesia a display host and ADR 0034 gave it a login page. Together, the only way to light a television in a foyer was to sign a human being into it and leave that session running on a screen anyone can walk up to: a person's credentials on a wall, a person's session as the thing signage depends on, and the display going dark when they are revoked or their session simply expires. A screen is not a person. Ekklesia now recognizes three principal classes — anonymous, authenticated human, and managed device — and a device is a first-class principal with its own credential and its own explicit permissions. It has no email, no password, and no row in the identity tables, and it satisfies the `authenticated` baseline never, so every route that settles for "somebody is signed in" stays closed to it. Device permissions live in their own table because ekklesia_core_grant.user_id is a non-null foreign key into the user table and making it polymorphic would rewrite the platform's central authorization record to serve one narrow case. That is a schema decision, not a second decision point: the evaluator gained one branch, so a device is allowed or denied by the same function, with the same deny-by-default, as anyone else — with no owner path it could reach and no baseline that stands in for a grant. The six-digit code is not the credential. It is printed across a screen in a public hallway, so it is treated as public: it identifies a request to an administrator and is worth nothing alone. Collecting the credential also requires a 256-bit claim secret held only in the requesting browser's HttpOnly cookie, and approving requires the restricted core.devices.manage permission. Without that split, reading a code off a wall would hand over the screen's identity. The permission a pairing asks for is read from the module's validated display declaration, never from the request, so a browser cannot ask to be granted core.devices.manage or another module's permission. Approval grants exactly that one permission. Credentials are stored only as SHA-256; the raw value exists in the Set-Cookie that issues it and the device's own cookie jar, and is never logged, returned in JSON, or placed in a URL. The cookie is HttpOnly, so the module display code running in that same page cannot read it. Revocation is a server-side column checked on every principal resolution, and re-pairing mints a new identity so an old credential can never come back. State transitions are conditional updates, so one code cannot be approved twice or claimed into two credentials under a race. /api/v1/principal still reports a device as anonymous: it is what the Dashboard uses to decide whether a person is signed in. Displays read their viewer from the descriptor instead, which already performed the authorization — so displays are descriptor-first while the Dashboard stays principal-first, and neither infers an identity by elimination. Proven end to end against real PostgreSQL and real HTTP: an unpaired screen shows a code, an owner approves it, the device opens the display descriptor and a realtime stream, and revocation closes both while the device still holds its cookie. An already-open SSE stream is bounded by realtime's existing five-minute reconnect rather than closed instantly, and that bound is documented rather than called immediate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> |
||
|
ekklesia
|
2e0fe059c3 | feat: add display kiosk host |