Merge pull request 'chore(release): prepare 0.1.2' (#62) from chore/release-0.1.2 into main

Reviewed-on: https://git.riverofglorymn.org/River_of_Glory_Church/Ekklesia/pulls/62
Reviewed-by: The_River <[email protected]>

.github/workflows/ci.yml

@@ -1,18 +1,13 @@
 name: CI
 
-# IMPORTANT — the currently inventoried server is Gitea 1.24.2, which *ignores* several keys used
-# below. Per https://docs.gitea.com/1.24/usage/actions/comparison, its unsupported workflow syntax
-# includes `permissions` / `jobs.<job_id>.permissions`, `concurrency`, and
-# `jobs.<job_id>.timeout-minutes`. They are declared here deliberately, so the workflow is already
-# correct on a supported release and on GitHub Actions, but on this server they are inert:
+# The server runs Gitea 1.27.2 (docs/development/security.md, "What this server honours"):
 #
-#   * `permissions:` does NOT restrict the in-job `GITEA_TOKEN`. Job-token permission controls,
-#     repository/owner defaults, and server-side maximum-permission clamping arrive in the 1.26
-#     feature line (https://docs.gitea.com/1.26/usage/actions/token-permissions). Until the server
-#     is upgraded and configured, the token's authority is whatever the server grants — not what
-#     this file requests.
-#   * `concurrency:` and `timeout-minutes:` are NOT bounded-execution guarantees here. Cancellation,
-#     timeout, and teardown must be enforced by the trusted runner provisioner/reaper.
+#   * `concurrency:` is honoured: a newer push to a pull request cancels the run it supersedes, so a
+#     cancelled run's own cleanup is never guaranteed (see the CI stack sweep in each stack job).
+#   * `permissions:` is supported by 1.27 with Gitea's own scopes, but what the job token can do on
+#     this server is not yet proven, so nothing here relies on it being read-only.
+#   * `timeout-minutes:` is no longer listed as unsupported, but is not verified here either;
+#     teardown relies on the stack sweep and the runner's own reaper.
 #
 # `persist-credentials: false` below is unaffected by any of this and is enforced by the action
 # itself. See docs/development/security.md.

README.md

@@ -218,9 +218,10 @@ undeployed state, and the launch checklist in a single place. **CI is accepted a
 trusted-code-only boundary**: the self-hosted Gitea runner executes only code controlled and
 reviewed by trusted repository collaborators, and unknown or untrusted pull requests must not
 execute on it automatically. What remains is operational and cannot be proven from this repository —
-upgrading Gitea past 1.24.2 (which *ignores* the workflow's `permissions`, `concurrency`, and
-`timeout-minutes` declarations), clamping job-token authority server-side, enforcing timeout and
-teardown in a trusted provisioner/reaper, and proving disposable runner isolation. Those are
+configuring and proving job-token authority server-side (the server now runs Gitea 1.27.2, which
+honours `concurrency` and documents `permissions`, but neither token limits nor `timeout-minutes` are
+verified on it yet), enforcing timeout and teardown in a trusted provisioner/reaper, and proving
+disposable runner isolation. Those are
 prerequisites for **executing untrusted contributions**, alongside the deployment checklist that
 gates a **public launch**; moving future public contribution workflows to a service with isolated
 hosted runners is an acceptable alternative. **Neither set of requirements blocks Phase 6** — Surface

apps/api/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/api",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "private": true,
   "type": "module",
   "files": [

core/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/core",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "private": true,
   "type": "module",
   "files": [

deploy/README.md

@@ -384,10 +384,10 @@ finds its files:
 ```sh
 docker build \
   --file deploy/Dockerfile \
-  --build-arg VERSION=0.1.1 \
+  --build-arg VERSION=0.1.2 \
   --build-arg REVISION="$(git rev-parse HEAD)" \
   --build-arg SOURCE=https://git.example.org/your-org/ekklesia \
-  --tag ekklesia:0.1.1 \
+  --tag ekklesia:0.1.2 \
   .
 ```
 

docs/architecture/decisions/0047-module-ci-harness.md

@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+# 0047: Every module proves itself inside Ekklesia, with one harness the platform publishes
+
+- Status: Proposed
+- Date: 2026-10-05
+- Supersedes: none
+- Related: [ADR 0016](0016-module-database-access.md),
+  [ADR 0021](0021-modules-as-hostable-products.md),
+  [ADR 0028](0028-module-operational-lifecycle.md),
+  [ADR 0030](0030-host-provided-module-object-storage.md),
+  [ADR 0033](0033-display-kiosk-host-contract.md),
+  [ADR 0036](0036-managed-device-identity-and-pairing.md),
+  [ADR 0041](0041-module-browser-contributions.md),
+  [ADR 0043](0043-display-offline-code-fallback.md),
+  [ADR 0044](0044-self-hosted-reference-deployment.md),
+  [ADR 0045](0045-split-dashboard-and-api-origins.md)
+
+## Context
+
+Modules are independently versioned products (ADR 0021). They live in their own repositories, and
+none of them can be built, run, or rendered without Ekklesia. The first production module, Signage,
+reached a church with three defects that only show when it runs **inside** Ekklesia, in a real
+browser:
+
+- every heartbeat its display sent was refused with a 400, because the display and the server
+  disagreed about `null`;
+- a display that failed one request at start-up never recovered without a reload;
+- its media cache leaked one blob per slide per refresh, until the browser refused the display's own
+  requests.
+
+Signage had unit tests, browser tests against a stubbed host, and no CI. Every test passed, because
+each half was tested against its own idea of the other, and nothing ever ran the module in the
+platform it ships into.
+
+The platform's own deployment smoke (ADR 0044, ADR 0045) does run a module in a real browser, but
+only the repository's template, and only far enough to mount it. The instance repository runs the
+smoke against its real modules, but only at release time, after a module has already been tagged.
+Each module repository that wants more than that has to assemble the platform, build an image,
+start a deployment, and drive a browser itself. Signage is about to do exactly that by hand. The
+second module, Classroom, would copy it, and the copies would drift from the platform they test.
+
+## Decision
+
+### The platform publishes a versioned module harness
+
+Each platform release publishes one OCI image, `ekklesia-module-harness:<platform version>`. It is
+built from the platform at that release tag by the platform's own release CI, and pushed to the
+organization's registry. A version is never overwritten. Modules reference it **by digest**.
+
+The harness contains the platform source at that version: its `deploy/` directory, its Dockerfile,
+its lockfile, and its smoke scripts. It also contains the pinned Node.js and pnpm, the browser
+driver, and the pinned headless Chromium image reference. Given a module checkout, it:
+
+1. **assembles** the module into the platform at `modules/<id>`, exactly as an instance does (ADR
+   0044), and installs with `--frozen-lockfile`;
+2. runs the platform's own gates against that set: `pnpm boundaries`, `modules:validate`,
+   `migrations:validate`, and the build;
+3. **builds** the deployment image from the assembled workspace with the platform's Dockerfile;
+4. starts the **reference deployment** in the split topology (ADR 0045), with a disposable
+   PostgreSQL and object store, Caddy's internal CA, and freshly generated secrets;
+5. plans, then **explicitly applies**, migrations against that fresh database. This is the only
+   database the harness ever migrates;
+6. creates the initial owner, grants the module's declared permissions to a test person, and
+   **mounts every UI surface the manifest declares**, in headless Chromium. That covers:
+   - the primary UI in the Dashboard;
+   - the display, paired as a device with no human session (ADR 0036);
+   - each browser contribution, whenever the module that hosts it is present (ADR 0041);
+7. runs a short **display soak**, and the **no-dead-ends** injections below;
+8. tears everything down: containers, networks, volumes, and the work directory.
+
+It **fails** on any of the following:
+
+- a `console.error` or uncaught exception on any page;
+- an unhandled promise rejection;
+- any 4xx or 5xx response that the harness did not itself expect. Expected ones are listed in the
+  harness, for example a display's descriptor before it is paired;
+- a page that never mounts;
+- a failed or refused request (CORS, blocked, network error);
+- a soak leak.
+
+Each failure line names the surface, the request path (never its query), and the step.
+
+### The display soak and the no-dead-ends checks are generic
+
+These checks come from what Signage got wrong, and they apply to any module with a display.
+
+- **Soak**, two minutes by default. The display stays mounted with no remount and no offline
+  indicator. Its realtime streams stay healthy. Live object URLs stay bounded. JavaScript heap
+  growth, measured over DevTools, stays within a fixed ratio.
+- **No dead ends.** One at a time, the harness refuses the first request to each module route the
+  display calls at start-up, and the first realtime connection. Within a bounded time and with no
+  reload, the display must make that request again and succeed. A display has nobody to press
+  Retry.
+
+Module-specific behaviour, such as Signage's heartbeat being recorded, is not guessed by the
+harness. A module declares it (below).
+
+### A module is tested against both ends of its compatibility range
+
+A module's CI runs the harness twice: against the **lowest** and the **newest** published platform
+version within its manifest's `compatibility.platform` range. Testing every version in between adds
+cost and finds little. Testing only the newest misses the floor the manifest promises to work on.
+
+The two versions, and their harness digests, are pinned in the module's repository. The harness
+refuses to run if:
+
+- a pinned version lies outside the module's range;
+- the lowest pinned version is not the range's floor.
+
+Moving to a newer platform is a deliberate, reviewed pin change, as an instance's is (ADR 0044). It
+is never a moving tag.
+
+A frozen install of the module assembled into each of those two platforms needs a lockfile per
+pinned version. The module keeps them (`ci/lock/<platform version>.yaml`), and the harness provides
+the one command that regenerates them inside its own pinned Node.js. A stale lockfile fails the
+frozen install, which is the signal to regenerate it in a reviewed change.
+
+### Modules declare extra smoke steps, beside their manifest rather than in it
+
+A module may add steps of its own in `ekklesia.harness.json`, next to `ekklesia.module.json`. Steps
+are declarative first:
+
+- open a surface;
+- wait for a test id;
+- call one of the module's routes as a named role, expecting a status;
+- soak for N minutes;
+- inject a failure into a named route;
+- check a value in the module's own table, through its own route.
+
+For what a declaration cannot express, a step may name a driver script in the module's repository.
+The harness runs that script with the same DevTools client and the same failure rules.
+
+**This is deliberately not a manifest field.** Manifest versions are strict, hard cutovers that every
+host validates (ADR 0033). A test step is not a runtime contract, and a host must never read one.
+Putting steps in the manifest would force a manifest version bump on every module for something
+that has no meaning outside CI.
+
+### Later: the harness checks what a module actually touches against what it declares
+
+In a later phase, the harness records what the module does while it runs:
+
+- the tables and schemas it reads and writes;
+- the buckets it uses;
+- its outbound network connections, with the egress network blocked and every attempt logged.
+
+It compares them with what the manifest declares (ADR 0016, ADR 0030). A module that touches what it
+did not declare fails. This is the module-trust check. The egress half needs a manifest declaration
+of outbound destinations that does not exist yet, and is a separate decision. This ADR fixes only
+the harness's shape, so that the recording phases can be added without changing how modules call
+it.
+
+### The template's workflow stays short, and calls the harness by digest
+
+`templates/module` ships a workflow that:
+
+- checks out the module with `persist-credentials: false` and pinned actions;
+- runs the module's own unit tests, typecheck, and lint;
+- sweeps stale CI stacks from the runner, then runs the harness, once per pinned platform version,
+  with one `docker run` of the harness image **by digest**, and finally, always, removes this job's
+  own stacks. The module directory is mounted read-only, and the runner's Docker is used exactly
+  as the platform's smoke uses it.
+
+It references no secret, needs no registry credential (the harness image is public within the
+organization), and uses no `pull_request_target`. The trusted-code-only rule for self-hosted runners
+applies to module repositories exactly as it does to the platform (see `docs/development/security.md`).
+
+**Why `docker run`, and not a reusable workflow or a composite action.** The server runs Gitea
+1.27.2. (This proposal first assumed 1.24.2; the reasons below hold on the actual version.)
+
+- Its runner can call a reusable workflow from another repository by cloning that repository, and
+  since 1.26 that includes private repositories (go-gitea/gitea#32562). That support is still thinly
+  documented, and has known problems in practice.
+- A reusable workflow would make the harness's behaviour depend on how this server and runner
+  version expand it. An image runs the same everywhere it runs.
+- Composite actions from another repository work through absolute `uses:` URLs. That would still
+  wrap the same `docker run`, adding a second pinned reference and nothing else.
+
+An image digest is the one reference that is equally immutable, equally reviewable, and works
+unchanged on any Gitea release and on GitHub Actions. A composite action can be added later as a
+convenience over the same image, without changing what a module pins.
+
+### Nothing the harness starts outlives the job that started it
+
+The harness starts Docker stacks on a shared runner, and a runner can kill a job outright: a
+cancelled or superseded job (`concurrency` cancels superseded runs on this server), or the runner's
+own time limit. A script's own cleanup trap does not run then. The platform's CI leaked a whole
+migration stack that way, and it ran until someone removed it by hand. So the harness follows the
+platform's rule (`scripts/ci-sweep.sh`, `docs/development/security.md`):
+
+- everything it starts is named and labeled as a CI stack of its run, attempt, and job key;
+- it removes its own stacks in a trap;
+- the template workflow runs the harness's **stale sweep** before the harness starts, and its
+  **job sweep** in a final `if: always()` step, so a killed run's stacks are removed by that run's
+  last step, or failing that by the next job on the runner.
+
+The sweep ships inside the harness image, so a module never copies it.
+
+### Publishing follows the instance's release pattern
+
+The harness image is pushed only by a `publish` job that runs on `v*` tags, after the platform's CI
+has built and tested that exact image (checked by image ID). That job:
+
+- uses a write-only package token, the only secret in the platform's workflow;
+- refuses to overwrite an existing version;
+- prints the digest.
+
+Pull requests and branch builds build the harness and run it against the template, but never push.
+The registry is reached exactly as the instance's publish job reaches it.
+
+### Adoption
+
+- **Signage** uses an interim CI job until the first harness is published. That job assembles
+  Signage into a pinned platform commit and runs the platform's display-device smoke scenarios.
+  Signage switches to the harness as soon as one is published.
+- **Classroom** follows.
+- **The template** carries the workflow from the first harness release on, so every new module has
+  it from its first commit.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- A module cannot reach a release without having run inside Ekklesia, in a real browser, at both
+  ends of the platform range it claims.
+- The defects that reached the first production Signage deployment fail a module's CI instead:
+  refused requests, dead ends, leaks, and console errors.
+- The platform owns one harness, versioned with itself. Modules do not copy deployment scripts that
+  then drift.
+- Every module's CI needs Docker on its runner, and takes minutes rather than seconds. The harness
+  runs as separate jobs from the unit tests, so a quick failure still reports quickly.
+- The platform's release process gains one published artifact, one credential, and one more failure
+  mode at release time.
+- A module now carries a lockfile for each pinned platform version. The harness makes regenerating
+  them one command, and a stale one fails visibly.
+
+## Alternatives
+
+- **Each module keeps its own copy of the smoke scripts.** Rejected. That is today's situation in
+  embryo, and it drifts.
+- **A reusable workflow in the platform repository.** Rejected for now, for the reasons above: thin
+  support in practice, and a harness whose behaviour depends on whichever runner and server version
+  happens to expand it.
+- **Publish the harness as an npm package.** Rejected. The harness needs Docker, a browser, and the
+  platform's deployment files anyway, so a package would ship a fraction of it and assume the rest.
+- **Test only the newest platform version.** Rejected. A module's range floor would go untested
+  until an installation that has not upgraded meets it.
+- **Put smoke steps in the manifest.** Rejected. Manifest versions are hard cutovers with runtime
+  meaning, and test steps have neither.
+- **Run the harness in the platform's CI against every known module.** Rejected. The platform would
+  need every module's source and would fail on modules it does not own. The direction is module
+  tests platform, not the reverse.
+
+## Deferred
+
+- The data-access and egress recording phases, and the manifest declaration egress needs.
+- A composite action over the harness image.
+- Running the harness against a module's declared dependencies at their own pinned versions, for
+  contributions hosted by another module.
+- Visual regression of mounted surfaces.

docs/architecture/decisions/README.md

@@ -55,3 +55,4 @@ ADRs capture durable choices that affect more than one package or phase.
 - [0044: Ekklesia ships one self-hosted reference deployment, composed from pinned sources](0044-self-hosted-reference-deployment.md) — Accepted
 - [0045: The Dashboard and the API may live on separate origins](0045-split-dashboard-and-api-origins.md) — Accepted
 - [0046: Ekklesia's branding is never forced on an installation](0046-installation-owned-branding.md) — Proposed
+- [0047: Every module proves itself inside Ekklesia, with one harness the platform publishes](0047-module-ci-harness.md) — Proposed

docs/development/security.md

@@ -693,8 +693,10 @@ public Dashboard login must be assessed with the actual edge/proxy controls befo
 
 ## Continuous integration boundary
 
-CI runs on self-hosted Gitea Actions runners. The inventoried server is **Gitea 1.24.2**, and that
-version determines which parts of the workflow are real guarantees and which are not.
+CI runs on self-hosted Gitea Actions runners. The server reports **Gitea 1.27.2** (`GET
+/api/v1/version`, checked 2026-10-06; this document previously said 1.24.2, which was stale). The
+server's actual version, not the documentation of an earlier one, determines which parts of the
+workflow are real guarantees and which are not.
 
 ### The current operating rule: trusted code only
 
@@ -727,24 +729,26 @@ so a later step in the same job cannot read or reuse it from there.
 It does **not** remove the short-lived `GITEA_TOKEN` from the job environment, and it does **not**
 reduce that token's server-side authority. A step that wants the token can still read it.
 
-### What Gitea 1.24 ignores — so the branch cannot claim it
+### What this server honours, and what is not yet verified
 
-Per the official comparison for this version
-(<https://docs.gitea.com/1.24/usage/actions/comparison>), Gitea 1.24's unsupported workflow syntax
-includes `permissions` and `jobs.<job_id>.permissions`, `concurrency`, and
-`jobs.<job_id>.timeout-minutes`. On this server those declarations are inert. Therefore:
+Each item separates what Gitea documents for 1.27
+(<https://docs.gitea.com/1.27/usage/actions/comparison>) from what has been observed on this server:
 
-- **The workflow's `permissions: contents: read` does not restrict the job token.** This branch
-  cannot claim the `GITEA_TOKEN` is read-only, because nothing in workflow YAML makes it so on
-  1.24. Job-token permission controls, repository/owner defaults, and server-side
-  maximum-permission clamping arrive in the 1.26 feature line
-  (<https://docs.gitea.com/1.26/usage/actions/token-permissions>).
-- **`concurrency` and `timeout-minutes` are not bounded-execution guarantees here.** Cancellation,
-  timeout, and teardown must be enforced by a trusted provisioner and reaper outside the workflow.
+- **`concurrency` is honoured.** Gitea supports it since 1.26 (go-gitea/gitea#32751), and on this
+  server a newer push to a pull request cancels the run it supersedes. Observed: Ekklesia run 133 was
+  cancelled when run 134 started for the same pull request, and run 135 when run 137 did. A
+  superseded run's own cleanup is therefore never guaranteed to run, which is one reason for the
+  stack sweep below.
+- **`permissions` is supported by 1.27, with Gitea's own scopes, but is not verified here.** The
+  server-side token-permission settings are not visible through the API, and nothing has yet proven
+  what the job token can and cannot do on this server. Until that proof exists (requirement 3
+  below), this repository still does not claim the `GITEA_TOKEN` is read-only.
+- **`timeout-minutes` is no longer listed as unsupported for 1.27, but is not verified here.**
+  Teardown does not rely on it: the stack sweep and a trusted reaper do.
+- **Still ignored:** `jobs.<job_id>.environment`, and any `runs-on` other than a single label.
 
-The declarations are kept deliberately: they are already correct for a supported Gitea release and
-for GitHub Actions, and keeping them means the upgrade does not require re-deriving the intent. They
-are documented as ignored, not removed.
+The declarations stay in the workflow either way: they state the intent, and are correct on GitHub
+Actions as well.
 
 ### Disposable stacks never outlive their job
 
@@ -793,16 +797,17 @@ they are not conditions on merging trusted, reviewed work.
 None of them can be satisfied by editing this repository; each requires access to the Gitea server
 and runner hosts, and each must be proven there.
 
-1. Upgrade Gitea to a reviewed supported release with job-token permission controls — at least the
-   1.26 feature line. Select the actual release during infrastructure work, after backup and
-   compatibility review; do not pin a version from this document.
+1. ~~Upgrade Gitea to a reviewed supported release with job-token permission controls — at least
+   the 1.26 feature line.~~ **Done:** the server runs 1.27.2. Items 2 and 3 now configure and prove
+   what it makes possible.
 2. Configure repository and owner defaults, and the server-side maximum permission, so workflow
    code cannot request more than read-only repository access.
 3. Prove against the real server that the job's `GITEA_TOKEN` cannot push code, create or update
    releases, packages, issues, or pull requests, change Actions configuration, or reach another
    private repository.
-4. Enforce job timeout, cancellation, concurrency, and teardown in the trusted
-   provisioner/reaper rather than relying on the ignored workflow keys above.
+4. Enforce job timeout and teardown in the trusted provisioner/reaper. `concurrency` is honoured
+   by the server; `timeout-minutes` is not yet verified, and the in-workflow stack sweep only
+   complements a reaper.
 5. Complete a disposable-guest runner isolation proof: one throwaway guest per job, torn down by a
    trusted reaper outside workflow YAML, holding no deployment credential, registration token, or
    reusable key.

package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "ekklesia",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "private": true,
   "type": "module",
   "description": "Open, modular church technology platform",

packages/contracts/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/contracts",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "type": "module",
   "files": [
     "dist"

packages/design-tokens/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/design-tokens",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "type": "module",
   "files": [
     "dist"

packages/module-sdk/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/module-sdk",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "type": "module",
   "files": [
     "dist"

packages/module-ui-build/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/module-ui-build",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "type": "module",
   "files": [
     "bin",

packages/module-ui-host/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/module-ui-host",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "type": "module",
   "files": [
     "dist"

packages/module-ui-sdk/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/module-ui-sdk",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "type": "module",
   "files": [
     "dist"

packages/typescript-config/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/typescript-config",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "private": true,
   "files": [
     "base.json",

packages/ui/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/ui",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "type": "module",
   "files": [
     "dist"

scripts/ci-sweep.sh

@@ -6,9 +6,10 @@
 #   bash scripts/ci-sweep.sh --job                           this job's own stacks, at any age
 #
 # Every CI script already removes its own stack in an EXIT trap, but a trap never runs when the runner
-# kills the job container: a cancelled job, or the runner's own time limit (Gitea 1.24 ignores
-# `timeout-minutes`). So each workflow job that starts stacks ends with `--job` in an `if: always()`
-# step, and begins with `--stale`, which catches whatever a killed job left before it could clean up.
+# kills the job container: a cancelled or superseded job (the server honours `concurrency`), or
+# the runner's own time limit. So each workflow job that starts stacks ends with `--job` in an
+# `if: always()` step, and begins with `--stale`, which catches whatever a killed job left before
+# it could clean up.
 #
 # What a stack is, and how it is found, is defined in scripts/lib/ci-project.sh: a Compose project
 # named with the `ekklesia-ci-` prefix (Compose labels everything it creates with that name), plus

surfaces/shell/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@ekklesia/shell",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "private": true,
   "type": "module",
   "files": [