Files
Ekklesia/docs/architecture/decisions/0047-module-ci-harness.md
T
ekklesiaandClaude Opus 5.5 1119cc5fdf
CI / verify (pull_request) Successful in 52s
CI / infrastructure-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 27s
CI / migration-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 1m50s
CI / image-build (pull_request) Successful in 22s
CI / deploy-smoke (same-origin) (pull_request) Successful in 49s
CI / deploy-smoke (split) (pull_request) Successful in 1m41s
docs: propose ADR 0049, Ekklesia Module Package v1
A separately versioned module is distributed as one immutable, self-contained,
deterministic .tar.gz with a separately distributed SHA-256. The package
contract is independent of hosting, registry, transport, and marketplace.

ADR 0049 extends ADR 0048 with:
- the package layout: one top-level module directory with a generated runtime
  package.json, the unchanged manifest, ekklesia.package.json, bundled backend
  entrypoints, built browser artifacts, migrations, THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES, and
  node_modules only for native dependencies;
- backend bundling of all pure-JavaScript dependencies, with externals decided
  and validated by the canonical packager, never by module authors;
- targets: `any`, or <platform>-<arch>[-<libc>] (linux-x64-glibc for Signage);
- ekklesia.package.json (packageFormat 1): id, version, target, runtime needs,
  provenance, incorporated SDK versions, a `transitional` Drizzle requirement
  explicitly not the Module Database ABI, and per-file size and SHA-256;
- archive safety: no links of any kind, no absolute or `..` paths, no special
  files or setuid/setgid; extraction normalizes ownership and modes;
- the intended installation lifecycle and its rollback limit: code-only
  rollback only before new migrations apply, a backup restore after;
- integrity, not authenticity; signing and trust roots deferred;
- pnpm deploy explicitly not the packaging mechanism.

Status Proposed, following the repository's usual lifecycle. ADR 0047 gains a
cross-reference to consume canonical packages. The module development guide no
longer recommends running pnpm deploy in a workspace, which corrupts that
workspace's install state. No runtime, tooling, Docker, CI, Signage, or
instance changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
2026-10-07 10:13:34 -05:00

263 lines
14 KiB
Markdown

# 0047: Every module proves itself inside Ekklesia, with one harness the platform publishes
- Status: Proposed
- Date: 2026-10-05
- Supersedes: none
- Related: [ADR 0016](0016-module-database-access.md),
[ADR 0021](0021-modules-as-hostable-products.md),
[ADR 0028](0028-module-operational-lifecycle.md),
[ADR 0030](0030-host-provided-module-object-storage.md),
[ADR 0033](0033-display-kiosk-host-contract.md),
[ADR 0036](0036-managed-device-identity-and-pairing.md),
[ADR 0041](0041-module-browser-contributions.md),
[ADR 0043](0043-display-offline-code-fallback.md),
[ADR 0044](0044-self-hosted-reference-deployment.md),
[ADR 0045](0045-split-dashboard-and-api-origins.md)
- Must be revised against: [ADR 0048](0048-generic-image-and-installed-module-storage.md) —
steps 1 and 3 below build the module into a deployment image, which ADR 0048 rules out. Before
this proposal is accepted, the harness must run the module from module storage in the generic
image.
- Should consume: [ADR 0049](0049-module-package-v1.md), when accepted — the harness installs the
module's canonical package, the artifact a church would install, rather than a workspace build.
## Context
Modules are independently versioned products (ADR 0021). They live in their own repositories, and
none of them can be built, run, or rendered without Ekklesia. The first production module, Signage,
reached a church with three defects that only show when it runs **inside** Ekklesia, in a real
browser:
- every heartbeat its display sent was refused with a 400, because the display and the server
disagreed about `null`;
- a display that failed one request at start-up never recovered without a reload;
- its media cache leaked one blob per slide per refresh, until the browser refused the display's own
requests.
Signage had unit tests, browser tests against a stubbed host, and no CI. Every test passed, because
each half was tested against its own idea of the other, and nothing ever ran the module in the
platform it ships into.
The platform's own deployment smoke (ADR 0044, ADR 0045) does run a module in a real browser, but
only the repository's template, and only far enough to mount it. The instance repository runs the
smoke against its real modules, but only at release time, after a module has already been tagged.
Each module repository that wants more than that has to assemble the platform, build an image,
start a deployment, and drive a browser itself. Signage is about to do exactly that by hand. The
second module, Classroom, would copy it, and the copies would drift from the platform they test.
## Decision
### The platform publishes a versioned module harness
Each platform release publishes one OCI image, `ekklesia-module-harness:<platform version>`. It is
built from the platform at that release tag by the platform's own release CI, and pushed to the
organization's registry. A version is never overwritten. Modules reference it **by digest**.
The harness contains the platform source at that version: its `deploy/` directory, its Dockerfile,
its lockfile, and its smoke scripts. It also contains the pinned Node.js and pnpm, the browser
driver, and the pinned headless Chromium image reference. Given a module checkout, it:
1. **assembles** the module into the platform at `modules/<id>`, exactly as an instance does (ADR
0044), and installs with `--frozen-lockfile`;
2. runs the platform's own gates against that set: `pnpm boundaries`, `modules:validate`,
`migrations:validate`, and the build;
3. **builds** the deployment image from the assembled workspace with the platform's Dockerfile;
4. starts the **reference deployment** in the split topology (ADR 0045), with a disposable
PostgreSQL and object store, Caddy's internal CA, and freshly generated secrets;
5. plans, then **explicitly applies**, migrations against that fresh database. This is the only
database the harness ever migrates;
6. creates the initial owner, grants the module's declared permissions to a test person, and
**mounts every UI surface the manifest declares**, in headless Chromium. That covers:
- the primary UI in the Dashboard;
- the display, paired as a device with no human session (ADR 0036);
- each browser contribution, whenever the module that hosts it is present (ADR 0041);
7. runs a short **display soak**, and the **no-dead-ends** injections below;
8. tears everything down: containers, networks, volumes, and the work directory.
It **fails** on any of the following:
- a `console.error` or uncaught exception on any page;
- an unhandled promise rejection;
- any 4xx or 5xx response that the harness did not itself expect. Expected ones are listed in the
harness, for example a display's descriptor before it is paired;
- a page that never mounts;
- a failed or refused request (CORS, blocked, network error);
- a soak leak.
Each failure line names the surface, the request path (never its query), and the step.
### The display soak and the no-dead-ends checks are generic
These checks come from what Signage got wrong, and they apply to any module with a display.
- **Soak**, two minutes by default. The display stays mounted with no remount and no offline
indicator. Its realtime streams stay healthy. Live object URLs stay bounded. JavaScript heap
growth, measured over DevTools, stays within a fixed ratio.
- **No dead ends.** One at a time, the harness refuses the first request to each module route the
display calls at start-up, and the first realtime connection. Within a bounded time and with no
reload, the display must make that request again and succeed. A display has nobody to press
Retry.
Module-specific behaviour, such as Signage's heartbeat being recorded, is not guessed by the
harness. A module declares it (below).
### A module is tested against both ends of its compatibility range
A module's CI runs the harness twice: against the **lowest** and the **newest** published platform
version within its manifest's `compatibility.platform` range. Testing every version in between adds
cost and finds little. Testing only the newest misses the floor the manifest promises to work on.
The two versions, and their harness digests, are pinned in the module's repository. The harness
refuses to run if:
- a pinned version lies outside the module's range;
- the lowest pinned version is not the range's floor.
Moving to a newer platform is a deliberate, reviewed pin change, as an instance's is (ADR 0044). It
is never a moving tag.
A frozen install of the module assembled into each of those two platforms needs a lockfile per
pinned version. The module keeps them (`ci/lock/<platform version>.yaml`), and the harness provides
the one command that regenerates them inside its own pinned Node.js. A stale lockfile fails the
frozen install, which is the signal to regenerate it in a reviewed change.
### Modules declare extra smoke steps, beside their manifest rather than in it
A module may add steps of its own in `ekklesia.harness.json`, next to `ekklesia.module.json`. Steps
are declarative first:
- open a surface;
- wait for a test id;
- call one of the module's routes as a named role, expecting a status;
- soak for N minutes;
- inject a failure into a named route;
- check a value in the module's own table, through its own route.
For what a declaration cannot express, a step may name a driver script in the module's repository.
The harness runs that script with the same DevTools client and the same failure rules.
**This is deliberately not a manifest field.** Manifest versions are strict, hard cutovers that every
host validates (ADR 0033). A test step is not a runtime contract, and a host must never read one.
Putting steps in the manifest would force a manifest version bump on every module for something
that has no meaning outside CI.
### Later: the harness checks what a module actually touches against what it declares
In a later phase, the harness records what the module does while it runs:
- the tables and schemas it reads and writes;
- the buckets it uses;
- its outbound network connections, with the egress network blocked and every attempt logged.
It compares them with what the manifest declares (ADR 0016, ADR 0030). A module that touches what it
did not declare fails. This is the module-trust check. The egress half needs a manifest declaration
of outbound destinations that does not exist yet, and is a separate decision. This ADR fixes only
the harness's shape, so that the recording phases can be added without changing how modules call
it.
### The template's workflow stays short, and calls the harness by digest
`templates/module` ships a workflow that:
- checks out the module with `persist-credentials: false` and pinned actions;
- runs the module's own unit tests, typecheck, and lint;
- sweeps stale CI stacks from the runner, then runs the harness, once per pinned platform version,
with one `docker run` of the harness image **by digest**, and finally, always, removes this job's
own stacks. The module directory is mounted read-only, and the runner's Docker is used exactly
as the platform's smoke uses it.
It references no secret, needs no registry credential (the harness image is public within the
organization), and uses no `pull_request_target`. The trusted-code-only rule for self-hosted runners
applies to module repositories exactly as it does to the platform (see `docs/development/security.md`).
**Why `docker run`, and not a reusable workflow or a composite action.** The server runs Gitea
1.27.2. (This proposal first assumed 1.24.2; the reasons below hold on the actual version.)
- Its runner can call a reusable workflow from another repository by cloning that repository, and
since 1.26 that includes private repositories (go-gitea/gitea#32562). That support is still thinly
documented, and has known problems in practice.
- A reusable workflow would make the harness's behaviour depend on how this server and runner
version expand it. An image runs the same everywhere it runs.
- Composite actions from another repository work through absolute `uses:` URLs. That would still
wrap the same `docker run`, adding a second pinned reference and nothing else.
An image digest is the one reference that is equally immutable, equally reviewable, and works
unchanged on any Gitea release and on GitHub Actions. A composite action can be added later as a
convenience over the same image, without changing what a module pins.
### Nothing the harness starts outlives the job that started it
The harness starts Docker stacks on a shared runner, and a runner can kill a job outright: a
cancelled or superseded job (`concurrency` cancels superseded runs on this server), or the runner's
own time limit. A script's own cleanup trap does not run then. The platform's CI leaked a whole
migration stack that way, and it ran until someone removed it by hand. So the harness follows the
platform's rule (`scripts/ci-sweep.sh`, `docs/development/security.md`):
- everything it starts is named and labeled as a CI stack of its run, attempt, and job key;
- it removes its own stacks in a trap;
- the template workflow runs the harness's **stale sweep** before the harness starts, and its
**job sweep** in a final `if: always()` step, so a killed run's stacks are removed by that run's
last step, or failing that by the next job on the runner.
The sweep ships inside the harness image, so a module never copies it.
### Publishing follows the instance's release pattern
The harness image is pushed only by a `publish` job that runs on `v*` tags, after the platform's CI
has built and tested that exact image (checked by image ID). That job:
- uses a write-only package token, the only secret in the platform's workflow;
- refuses to overwrite an existing version;
- prints the digest.
Pull requests and branch builds build the harness and run it against the template, but never push.
The registry is reached exactly as the instance's publish job reaches it.
### Adoption
- **Signage** uses an interim CI job until the first harness is published. That job assembles
Signage into a pinned platform commit and runs the platform's display-device smoke scenarios.
Signage switches to the harness as soon as one is published.
- **Classroom** follows.
- **The template** carries the workflow from the first harness release on, so every new module has
it from its first commit.
## Consequences
- A module cannot reach a release without having run inside Ekklesia, in a real browser, at both
ends of the platform range it claims.
- The defects that reached the first production Signage deployment fail a module's CI instead:
refused requests, dead ends, leaks, and console errors.
- The platform owns one harness, versioned with itself. Modules do not copy deployment scripts that
then drift.
- Every module's CI needs Docker on its runner, and takes minutes rather than seconds. The harness
runs as separate jobs from the unit tests, so a quick failure still reports quickly.
- The platform's release process gains one published artifact, one credential, and one more failure
mode at release time.
- A module now carries a lockfile for each pinned platform version. The harness makes regenerating
them one command, and a stale one fails visibly.
## Alternatives
- **Each module keeps its own copy of the smoke scripts.** Rejected. That is today's situation in
embryo, and it drifts.
- **A reusable workflow in the platform repository.** Rejected for now, for the reasons above: thin
support in practice, and a harness whose behaviour depends on whichever runner and server version
happens to expand it.
- **Publish the harness as an npm package.** Rejected. The harness needs Docker, a browser, and the
platform's deployment files anyway, so a package would ship a fraction of it and assume the rest.
- **Test only the newest platform version.** Rejected. A module's range floor would go untested
until an installation that has not upgraded meets it.
- **Put smoke steps in the manifest.** Rejected. Manifest versions are hard cutovers with runtime
meaning, and test steps have neither.
- **Run the harness in the platform's CI against every known module.** Rejected. The platform would
need every module's source and would fail on modules it does not own. The direction is module
tests platform, not the reverse.
## Deferred
- The data-access and egress recording phases, and the manifest declaration egress needs.
- A composite action over the harness image.
- Running the harness against a module's declared dependencies at their own pinned versions, for
contributions hosted by another module.
- Visual regression of mounted surfaces.