Files
Ekklesia/docs/architecture/platform-architecture.md
T
ekklesia 91d8f5946f
CI / verify (pull_request) Successful in 27s
CI / infrastructure-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 19s
CI / migration-smoke (pull_request) Successful in 26s
feat: expose core identity transport
2026-07-21 19:15:14 -05:00

107 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown

# Platform architecture
Ekklesia is a long-lived platform from which churches can compose many applications and user
experiences. It begins as a modular monolith so contracts can stabilize before distribution is
introduced.
## Dependency model
The arrows below mean "depends on." Presentation and composition depend on stable lower-level
contracts; infrastructure never learns individual feature names.
```text
Surface Builder configuration -> Surfaces -> public capability contracts
^
|
HTTP/API and client contracts
|
Feature Modules -> Module SDK / platform contracts <- Core implementations
```
The four ownership layers are:
1. **Core** orchestrates generic platform infrastructure: startup, identity, permissions,
configuration, database connectivity, storage, events, jobs, module discovery, and lifecycle.
2. **Modules** own backend domain behavior, data schemas, resources, actions, routes, events,
permissions, and jobs.
3. **Surfaces** own every presentation concern: components, renderers, layout, navigation,
accessibility, interaction, branding, and client state.
4. **Surface Builder** stores validated declarative composition. It selects capabilities and
surface-owned renderers but contains neither executable code nor module business logic.
Modules do not own UI. For example, Calendar data, actions, and permissions will live in
`modules/calendar`; Calendar renderers for a dashboard or public website will live in those
surfaces.
## Stable seams
- Modules use public SDK ports and injected Core services, never undocumented Core internals.
- Modules do not import another module's schema or private code. Integrations use public service
contracts, capabilities, events, or APIs.
- Surfaces consume API/client and capability contracts, never feature-module packages.
- Core discovers feature modules generically. It contains no feature-specific imports or
conditional branches.
- Deployable apps are thin composition roots and do not become domain-logic owners.
- Generated bootstrap artifacts may connect discovered entry points at the application edge;
they do not become manually maintained Core registries.
## Security invariants
- Authorization is enforced server-side.
- Secrets are isolated from public configuration and logs.
- Authentication tokens, private form content, prayer requests, and pastoral information are not
logged.
- Sensitive actions are designed for auditability without copying sensitive content into audit
records.
- Private objects use signed access and namespaced storage paths.
- Every network service starts from least-privilege and local-only development defaults.
## Current implementation status
Implemented now: the Phase 1 repository and infrastructure foundation plus public module contracts,
static versioned manifests, independent capability versions and dependency ranges, automatic
filesystem discovery, compiled server loading, runtime-definition verification, staged capability
registration, dependency-ordered startup and reverse shutdown, rollback, and a backend-only module
template. Optional compiled schema entrypoints now contribute validated, namespaced module-owned
Drizzle tables to a deterministic aggregate without connecting to a database. Optional module-owned
Drizzle migration directories now produce an atomic dependency-ordered offline inventory with
validated metadata, explicit destructive-change declarations, and exact SHA-256 checksums. Core can
now compare that inventory with its fixed PostgreSQL history table, produce a read-only plan, and
apply the complete pending batch under a session advisory lock and one transaction. Destructive
migrations require an exact externally supplied approval bound to module, identity, and checksum.
Hermetic integration coverage now exercises those contracts through the production adapter against
the pinned PostgreSQL container, including real DDL rollback and advisory-lock concurrency. The
Core-owned Doctor composes those existing services into a deterministic terminal readiness report:
static module, schema, and migration validation always run when their prerequisites succeed, while
PostgreSQL history planning runs only when configured. Schema inspection evaluates compiled schema
definition entrypoints, which the module contract requires to be side-effect-free; Doctor never
imports or starts module server entrypoints. It does not apply migrations or modify PostgreSQL, and
it honestly skips object storage because no production Core storage service exists yet.
Phase 4A added the Core identity foundation. Core owns a Better Auth-backed identity schema
(`ekklesia_core_user`, `ekklesia_core_session`, `ekklesia_core_account`,
`ekklesia_core_verification`) reachable only through Ekklesia-owned contracts and an explicit
Core-owned Better Auth construction boundary; modules never import Better Auth or receive a raw
database client. That schema ships as a first-class Core-owned migration source that reuses the
exact migration format, checksum rule, planner, and transactional runner Phase 3 already
established, ordered before module migrations in the same aggregate. See
[ADR 0010](decisions/0010-core-identity-and-better-auth-adoption.md).
Phase 4B adds identity HTTP transport: a minimal Hono-based `apps/api` composition root mounts
Better Auth at `/api/auth/*` and exposes one Ekklesia-owned route, `GET /api/v1/principal`, behind
Core's own Fetch-compatible identity runtime (`@ekklesia/core/identity`) — Core still does not
depend on Hono. Public email/password registration is intentional; every account receives
identical lowest-privilege baseline status, and signup order never grants elevation. See
[ADR 0011](decisions/0011-identity-http-transport-and-public-enrollment.md) and
[the API guide](../development/api.md), and
[the identity development guide](../development/identity.md) for the underlying schema and
contracts. It is now possible to publicly register, sign in, resolve a principal, and sign out; it
is not yet possible to verify an email, recover a password, reach a Dashboard, or hold any role or
permission.
The next architectural phase is Phase 4C: Core authorization (public / authenticated-baseline /
relationship-derived / grants / platform-owner) and an explicit, auditable platform-owner bootstrap
command. Other target architecture not yet implemented includes production approval-provider
composition, physical storage-bucket provisioning, Surface SDK, richer public resource and action
contracts, dashboard, Builder, and reference feature modules.